Kundile Veettil Muhaseenath Salma vs Afnad Advocate - K SATHYAN — 24/2022
Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 12. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 20th April 2026.
MC - MISCELLANEOUS CASE
CNR: KLKN250001432022
Filing Number
142/2022
Filing Date
03-08-2022
Registration No
24/2022
Registration Date
03-08-2022
Court
Gramnyayalaya, Iritty at Payam
Judge
1-Nyayadhikari
Decision Date
20th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Kundile Veettil Muhaseenath Salma
Adv. T A Justine
Respondent(s)
Afnad Advocate - K SATHYAN
Seenath
Adv. K SATHYAN
Swaliha
Adv. K SATHYAN
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Nyayadhikari
Disposed
Order/ Judgement
For further hearing
For further hearing
For further hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-04-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 13-04-2026 | For further hearing |
| 04-04-2026 | For further hearing |
| 30-03-2026 | For further hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: MC 24/2022 Court: Village Court (Gram Nyayalaya), Iritti, Payyanur Judge: Sri. Mohamed Mausoom. P. T. Date: April 20, 2026 Petitioner: Kundile Veettil Muhaseenath Salma (21-year-old woman) Respondents: 1. Afnad (husband) 2. Seenath (mother-in-law) 3. Swaliha (sister-in-law) Decision The court partially granted the petitioner's application under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The court found that the petitioner suffered domestic violence including physical abuse, financial exploitation, and emotional cruelty from her in-laws. The court issued a protection order under Section 18 of the 2005 Act and ordered monthly maintenance of Rs. 10,000 from the first respondent. Additionally, the court awarded compensation of Rs. 6,00,000 to be paid jointly by all three respondents under Section 22 of the 2005 Act. However, the court rejected the petitioner's claim for return of specific gold ornaments (20¾ sovereigns) due to insufficient evidence of their alleged misappropriation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: MC 24/2022 Court: Village Court (Gram Nyayalaya), Iritti, Payyanur Judge: Sri. Mohamed Mausoom. P. T. Date: April 20, 2026 Petitioner: Kundile Veettil Muhaseenath Salma (21-year-old woman) Respondents: 1. Afnad (husband) 2. Seenath (mother-in-law) 3. Swaliha (sister-in-law) Decision The court partially granted the petitioner's application under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The court found that the petitioner suffered domestic violence including physical abuse, financial exploitation, and emotional cruelty from her in-laws. The court issued a protection order under Section 18 of the 2005 Act and ordered monthly maintenance of Rs. 10,000 from the first respondent. Additionally, the court awarded compensation of Rs. 6,00,000 to be paid jointly by all three respondents under Section 22 of the 2005 Act. However, the court rejected the petitioner's claim for return of specific gold ornaments (20¾ sovereigns) due to insufficient evidence of their alleged misappropriation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts