Excise Inspector Iritty vs Vargheese P M Advocate - SUNIL KUMAR C C — 5/2026
Case under Abkari Act Section 55(i). Disposed: Uncontested--COMMITTED TO SESSIONS COURT on 13th March 2026.
Cr.No(KNR- ERO-Abkari- Iritty) - EXCISE RANGE OFFICE, IRITTY -Abkari
CNR: KLKN240070672025
Filing Number
136/2025
Filing Date
13-Dec-2025
Registration No
5/2026
Registration Date
07-Feb-2026
Court
J F C M, Mattannur
Judge
1-Judicial First Class Magistrate
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--COMMITTED TO SESSIONS COURT
Last updated 25-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
136
Police Station
Iritty Excise Range
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Excise Inspector Iritty
Respondent(s)
-
1.Vargheese P M Advocate - SUNIL KUMAR C C
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The Judicial First Class Magistrate, Mattannur committed the case against Varghese P.M. to the Sessions Court, Thalassery under Section 232 of BNSS (Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita). The accused was charged with illegally selling KSBC liquor under Section 55(i) of the Kerala Abkari Act, an offense triable exclusively by the Court of Sessions. The magistrate found sufficient grounds for commitment after the accused appeared before the court and received copies of prosecution records. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
12-Mar-2026
For committal
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
28-Feb-2026
For Steps
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
21-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-Dec-2025
Bail Bond
-
15-Dec-2025
Release memo
-
13-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 5/2026
The Judicial First Class Magistrate, Mattannur committed the case against Varghese P.M. to the Sessions Court, Thalassery under Section 232 of BNSS (Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita). The accused was charged with illegally selling KSBC liquor under Section 55(i) of the Kerala Abkari Act, an offense triable exclusively by the Court of Sessions. The magistrate found sufficient grounds for commitment after the accused appeared before the court and received copies of prosecution records. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts