Niravath Jubily Chits India Private Limited Represented By Its Power Of Attorney Holder Antony P T vs Vijilesh K V — 3242/2023
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142. Disposed: Uncontested--ACQUITTED on 23rd March 2026.
ST - SUMMARY TRIAL
CNR: KLKN240039872023
e-Filing Number
14-06-2023
Filing Number
3921/2023
Filing Date
31-Jul-2023
Registration No
3242/2023
Registration Date
31-Jul-2023
Court
J F C M, Mattannur
Judge
1-Judicial First Class Magistrate
Decision Date
23-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 29-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Niravath Jubily Chits India Private Limited Represented By Its Power Of Attorney Holder Antony P T
Adv. DINESAN K
Respondent(s)
-
1.Vijilesh K V
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
23-Mar-2026
Judgement
Case Summary (3242/2023): Niravath Jubily Chits India Private Limited filed a private complaint against Vijilesh K V under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (cheque bounce case). The complainant subsequently filed a petition seeking permission to withdraw the complaint. The court found sufficient grounds for withdrawal and granted permission, acquitting the accused under Section 257 of Cr.PC/Section 280 of BNSS. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
19-Nov-2025
82-83 steps
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
25-Aug-2025
No sitting notified
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
24-Mar-2025
Repeat NBW
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
28-Sep-2024
Issue NBW
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
24-Jun-2024
Issue Bailable Warrant
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
09-Oct-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
31-Jul-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 3242/2023
Case Summary (3242/2023): Niravath Jubily Chits India Private Limited filed a private complaint against Vijilesh K V under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (cheque bounce case). The complainant subsequently filed a petition seeking permission to withdraw the complaint. The court found sufficient grounds for withdrawal and granted permission, acquitting the accused under Section 257 of Cr.PC/Section 280 of BNSS. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts