Aan serin jose vs Saviyo Joseph — 47/2020
Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 12. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 25th April 2026.
MC - MISCELLANEOUS CASE
CNR: KLKN240023272020
Filing Number
47/2020
Filing Date
28-12-2020
Registration No
47/2020
Registration Date
28-12-2020
Court
J F C M, Mattannur
Judge
1-Judicial First Class Magistrate
Decision Date
25th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Aan serin jose
Respondent(s)
Saviyo Joseph
Joseph Olikkunnel
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judicial First Class Magistrate
Disposed
For Orders
For Orders
For further hearing
FOR HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 25-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 21-04-2026 | For Orders |
| 17-04-2026 | For Orders |
| 01-04-2026 | For further hearing |
| 18-03-2026 | FOR HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case 47/2020 The court found the petitioner proved domestic violence during her marriage (2012-2018) and granted her status as an "aggrieved person" under the Domestic Violence Act. However, the court rejected her requests for eviction and prohibitory orders against the respondents from the disputed property, citing Kerala High Court precedent that residence orders don't apply post-divorce. The court awarded partial compensation: ₹5,00,000 from Respondent No.1 and ₹1,00,000 from Respondent No.2, considering their income and the nature of proven cruelty, while declining the petitioner's claim for ₹25,00,000. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 47/2020 The court found the petitioner proved domestic violence during her marriage (2012-2018) and granted her status as an "aggrieved person" under the Domestic Violence Act. However, the court rejected her requests for eviction and prohibitory orders against the respondents from the disputed property, citing Kerala High Court precedent that residence orders don't apply post-divorce. The court awarded partial compensation: ₹5,00,000 from Respondent No.1 and ₹1,00,000 from Respondent No.2, considering their income and the nature of proven cruelty, while declining the petitioner's claim for ₹25,00,000. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts