Iritty Chits and Finance and Investments (Pvt) Ltd. vs Daisy mathew Advocate - JAYANANDAN P — 172/2015
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138ofNIAct. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 03rd June 2026.
ST - SUMMARY TRIAL
CNR: KLKN240015462015
Filing Number
5916/2015
Filing Date
09-Apr-2015
Registration No
172/2015
Registration Date
25-May-2015
Court
J F C M, Mattannur
Judge
1-Judicial First Class Magistrate
Decision Date
03-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 29-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Iritty Chits and Finance and Investments (Pvt) Ltd.
Adv. Kishor
Respondent(s)
-
1.Daisy mathew Advocate - JAYANANDAN P
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
03-Jun-2026
Judgement
Case Summary: Iritty Chits and Finance v. Daisy Mathew (STC 172/2015) The court acquitted the accused of cheque bounce charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, finding the complainant failed to prove a legally enforceable debt matching the cheque amount of ₹71,32,341. Though the accused's cheque signature was undisputed and underlying chitty/loan transactions were established, account statements showed total dues of ₹75,42,037 as of later dates, creating a ₹4,09,696 discrepancy unexplained by the complainant's witness, undermining the prosecution's case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
03-Jun-2026
Disposed
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
30-May-2026
Order/Judgement
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
26-May-2026
Order/ Judgement
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
25-May-2026
For further hearing
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
20-May-2026
For Hearing
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
18-May-2026
For further hearing
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
16-May-2026
For further hearing
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
13-May-2026
For further hearing
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
12-May-2026
For Hearing
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
11-May-2026
Defence Evidence
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
07-May-2026
Examination of the Accused U/S 313 Cr.PC
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
27-Apr-2026
Adjourned
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
20-Apr-2026
Further evidence
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
16-Apr-2026
For cross examination
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
07-Apr-2026
Adjourned
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
01-Apr-2026
for verification
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
23-Mar-2026
For evidence
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
28-Feb-2026
For evidence
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
18-Feb-2026
For evidence
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
07-Feb-2026
For evidence
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
05-Feb-2026
for verification
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
28-Jan-2026
Issue notice
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
27-Jan-2026
Produce accused
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
21-Jan-2026
Produce accused
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
14-Jan-2026
Adjourned
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
05-Jan-2026
Produce accused
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
02-Dec-2025
Issue Summons
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
28-Nov-2025
Disposed
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
27-Nov-2025
Issue notice
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
24-Nov-2025
Adjourned
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
10-Nov-2017
—
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
20-Oct-2017
For evidence.
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
16-Oct-2017
For evidence.
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
21-Aug-2017
For evidence.
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
05-Jun-2017
For evidence.
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
27-Mar-2017
For evidence.
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
02-Feb-2017
For evidence.
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
12-Jan-2017
For framing charge
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
05-Nov-2016
No sitting notified
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
17-Aug-2016
call on
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
06-May-2016
call on
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
20-Feb-2016
call on
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
10-Dec-2015
call on
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
14-Oct-2015
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Apr-2015
Case filed
Registration No. 172/2015
Case Summary: Iritty Chits and Finance v. Daisy Mathew (STC 172/2015) The court acquitted the accused of cheque bounce charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, finding the complainant failed to prove a legally enforceable debt matching the cheque amount of ₹71,32,341. Though the accused's cheque signature was undisputed and underlying chitty/loan transactions were established, account statements showed total dues of ₹75,42,037 as of later dates, creating a ₹4,09,696 discrepancy unexplained by the complainant's witness, undermining the prosecution's case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts