Iritty Chits and Finance and Investments (Pvt) Ltd. vs Daisy mathew Advocate - JAYANANDAN P — 172/2015

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138ofNIAct. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 03rd June 2026.

Case disposed

ST - SUMMARY TRIAL

CNR: KLKN240015462015

Filing Number

5916/2015

Filing Date

09-Apr-2015

Registration No

172/2015

Registration Date

25-May-2015

Court

J F C M, Mattannur

Judge

1-Judicial First Class Magistrate

Decision Date

03-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 29-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138ofNIAct

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Iritty Chits and Finance and Investments (Pvt) Ltd.

    Adv. Kishor

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Daisy mathew Advocate - JAYANANDAN P

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 03-Jun-2026

    Judgement

    Case Summary: Iritty Chits and Finance v. Daisy Mathew (STC 172/2015) The court acquitted the accused of cheque bounce charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, finding the complainant failed to prove a legally enforceable debt matching the cheque amount of ₹71,32,341. Though the accused's cheque signature was undisputed and underlying chitty/loan transactions were established, account statements showed total dues of ₹75,42,037 as of later dates, creating a ₹4,09,696 discrepancy unexplained by the complainant's witness, undermining the prosecution's case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 03-Jun-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  4. 30-May-2026

    Order/Judgement

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  5. 26-May-2026

    Order/ Judgement

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  6. 25-May-2026

    For further hearing

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  7. 20-May-2026

    For Hearing

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  8. 18-May-2026

    For further hearing

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  9. 16-May-2026

    For further hearing

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  10. 13-May-2026

    For further hearing

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  11. 12-May-2026

    For Hearing

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  12. 11-May-2026

    Defence Evidence

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  13. 07-May-2026

    Examination of the Accused U/S 313 Cr.PC

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  14. 27-Apr-2026

    Adjourned

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  15. 20-Apr-2026

    Further evidence

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  16. 16-Apr-2026

    For cross examination

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  17. 07-Apr-2026

    Adjourned

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  18. 01-Apr-2026

    for verification

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  19. 23-Mar-2026

    For evidence

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  20. 28-Feb-2026

    For evidence

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  21. 18-Feb-2026

    For evidence

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  22. 07-Feb-2026

    For evidence

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  23. 05-Feb-2026

    for verification

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  24. 28-Jan-2026

    Issue notice

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  25. 27-Jan-2026

    Produce accused

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  26. 21-Jan-2026

    Produce accused

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  27. 14-Jan-2026

    Adjourned

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  28. 05-Jan-2026

    Produce accused

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  29. 02-Dec-2025

    Issue Summons

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  30. 28-Nov-2025

    Disposed

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  31. 27-Nov-2025

    Issue notice

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  32. 24-Nov-2025

    Adjourned

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  33. 10-Nov-2017

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  34. 20-Oct-2017

    For evidence.

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  35. 16-Oct-2017

    For evidence.

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  36. 21-Aug-2017

    For evidence.

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  37. 05-Jun-2017

    For evidence.

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  38. 27-Mar-2017

    For evidence.

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  39. 02-Feb-2017

    For evidence.

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  40. 12-Jan-2017

    For framing charge

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  41. 05-Nov-2016

    No sitting notified

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  42. 17-Aug-2016

    call on

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  43. 06-May-2016

    call on

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  44. 20-Feb-2016

    call on

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  45. 10-Dec-2015

    call on

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  46. 14-Oct-2015

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  47. 09-Apr-2015

    Case filed

    Registration No. 172/2015

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Iritty Chits and Finance v. Daisy Mathew (STC 172/2015) The court acquitted the accused of cheque bounce charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, finding the complainant failed to prove a legally enforceable debt matching the cheque amount of ₹71,32,341. Though the accused's cheque signature was undisputed and underlying chitty/loan transactions were established, account statements showed total dues of ₹75,42,037 as of later dates, creating a ₹4,09,696 discrepancy unexplained by the complainant's witness, undermining the prosecution's case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case