State of Kerala (Police) vs PRASAD P Advocate - ASWATHIRAJ B R — 6/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),110,118(2),3(5). Disposed: Uncontested--committed to sessions court on 19th March 2026.
Cr.No(KNR-PS-Kuthuparamba) - Kuthuparamba PS
CNR: KLKN230044572025
e-Filing Number
11-08-2025
Filing Number
675/2025
Filing Date
24-10-2025
Registration No
6/2026
Registration Date
03-02-2026
Court
Juditial First Class Magistrate Court Kuthuparamba
Judge
2-Judicial First Class Magistrate, Kuthuparamba
Decision Date
19th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--committed to sessions court
FIR Details
FIR Number
675
Police Station
Kuthupramba Police Station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Kerala (Police)
Respondent(s)
PRASAD P Advocate - ASWATHIRAJ B R
RIJIL C K
Adv. ASWATHIRAJ B R,ASWATHIRAJ B R
RAJEESH MAVILA
Adv. ASWATHIRAJ B R,ASWATHIRAJ B R
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Judicial First Class Magistrate, Kuthuparamba
Disposed
For verification
repeat summons
repeat summons
Issue Summons
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 19-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | For verification |
| 05-03-2026 | repeat summons |
| 27-02-2026 | repeat summons |
| 03-02-2026 | Issue Summons |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Judicial First Class Magistrate, Kuthuparamba committed the case against three accused persons (Rijil C K, Prasad P, and Rajeesh Mavila) to the Sessions Court, Thalassery for trial. The charges involved violations of Sections 126(2), 115(2), 110, 118(2), and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, with the magistrate finding sufficient grounds to proceed after hearing both sides. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Judicial First Class Magistrate, Kuthuparamba committed the case against three accused persons (Rijil C K, Prasad P, and Rajeesh Mavila) to the Sessions Court, Thalassery for trial. The charges involved violations of Sections 126(2), 115(2), 110, 118(2), and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, with the magistrate finding sufficient grounds to proceed after hearing both sides. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts