State of Kerala (Police) vs PRASAD P Advocate - ASWATHIRAJ B R — 6/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),110,118(2),3(5). Disposed: Uncontested--committed to sessions court on 19th March 2026.
Cr.No(KNR-PS-Kuthuparamba) - Kuthuparamba PS
CNR: KLKN230044572025
e-Filing Number
11-08-2025
Filing Number
675/2025
Filing Date
24-Oct-2025
Registration No
6/2026
Registration Date
03-Feb-2026
Court
Juditial First Class Magistrate Court Kuthuparamba
Judge
2-Judicial First Class Magistrate, Kuthuparamba
Decision Date
19-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--committed to sessions court
Last updated 10-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
675
Police Station
Kuthupramba Police Station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Kerala (Police)
Respondent(s)
-
1.PRASAD P Advocate - ASWATHIRAJ B R
-
2.RIJIL C K
Adv. ASWATHIRAJ B R,ASWATHIRAJ B R
-
3.RAJEESH MAVILA
Adv. ASWATHIRAJ B R,ASWATHIRAJ B R
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
19-Mar-2026
JudgementView PDF
The Judicial First Class Magistrate, Kuthuparamba committed the case against three accused persons (Rijil C K, Prasad P, and Rajeesh Mavila) to the Sessions Court, Thalassery for trial. The charges involved violations of Sections 126(2), 115(2), 110, 118(2), and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, with the magistrate finding sufficient grounds to proceed after hearing both sides. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judicial First Class Magistrate, Kuthuparamba
-
16-Mar-2026
For verification
Judicial First Class Magistrate, Kuthuparamba
-
05-Mar-2026
repeat summons
Judicial First Class Magistrate, Kuthuparamba
-
27-Feb-2026
repeat summons
Judicial First Class Magistrate, Kuthuparamba
-
03-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Oct-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 6/2026
The Judicial First Class Magistrate, Kuthuparamba committed the case against three accused persons (Rijil C K, Prasad P, and Rajeesh Mavila) to the Sessions Court, Thalassery for trial. The charges involved violations of Sections 126(2), 115(2), 110, 118(2), and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, with the magistrate finding sufficient grounds to proceed after hearing both sides. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts