State of Kerala (Police) vs Rithin C P — 331/2019
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 448,323,324,34. Disposed: Contested--AQUITTED on 27th April 2026.
CC - CALENDAR CASE
CNR: KLKN230013252019
Filing Number
1322/2019
Filing Date
10-06-2019
Registration No
331/2019
Registration Date
10-06-2019
Court
Juditial First Class Magistrate Court Kuthuparamba
Judge
2-Judicial First Class Magistrate, Kuthuparamba
Decision Date
27th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--AQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
349
Police Station
Kuthupramba Police Station
Year
2019
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Kerala (Police)
Adv. G.P
Respondent(s)
Rithin C P
Shinoj M K
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Judicial First Class Magistrate, Kuthuparamba
Disposed
For Judgement
for further hearing
for further hearing
FOR HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 24-04-2026 | For Judgement |
| 17-04-2026 | for further hearing |
| 07-04-2026 | for further hearing |
| 01-04-2026 | FOR HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of Kerala v. Rithin C P and Shinoj M K (CC 331/2019) The Judicial First Class Magistrate, Kuthuparamba acquitted both accused of charges under IPC Sections 448 (house trespass), 323 (voluntarily causing hurt), and 324 (causing hurt with dangerous weapon) read with Section 34 (common intention). The court found the prosecution's evidence inconsistent and unbelievable, particularly noting that the primary witnesses' testimony contradicted the initial complaint and medical examination findings—no head injury was documented despite claims of torch strikes, and the complainant failed to report such injuries to the examining doctor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Kerala v. Rithin C P and Shinoj M K (CC 331/2019) The Judicial First Class Magistrate, Kuthuparamba acquitted both accused of charges under IPC Sections 448 (house trespass), 323 (voluntarily causing hurt), and 324 (causing hurt with dangerous weapon) read with Section 34 (common intention). The court found the prosecution's evidence inconsistent and unbelievable, particularly noting that the primary witnesses' testimony contradicted the initial complaint and medical examination findings—no head injury was documented despite claims of torch strikes, and the complainant failed to report such injuries to the examining doctor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts