Mazhuppel Chits Private Limited, Payyavoor, Represented by the Managing Director and Foreman Richard Joseph vs Yoosaf K (Kottarathil) — 973/2025

Case under Procedure Code \ Section Order XXI Rule 11,54,64,68. Disposed: Uncontested--E.P. DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT. on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

EP - EXECUTION PETITION

CNR: KLKN220015772025

Filing Number

1482/2025

Filing Date

09-Oct-2025

Registration No

973/2025

Registration Date

25-Oct-2025

Court

Munsiffss Court Kuthuparamba

Judge

1-Munsiff/Jfcm No.2, Kuthuparamba

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--E.P. DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT.

Last updated 25-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Procedure Code \ Section Order XXI Rule 11,54,64,68

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Mazhuppel Chits Private Limited, Payyavoor, Represented by the Managing Director and Foreman Richard Joseph

    Adv. BABU P A PULIYAMMAKKAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Yoosaf K (Kottarathil)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Order

    The Munsiff Court of Kuthuparamba dismissed Execution Petition No. 973/2025 filed by Mazhuppel Chits Private Limited against Yoosaf K for default. The petitioner and their counsel failed to appear for the hearing and did not produce required documents, leading the court to conclude the petitioner lacked intent to proceed with the execution petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Munsiff/Jfcm No.2, Kuthuparamba

  4. 24-Jan-2026

    No sitting.Reposted to

    Munsiff/Jfcm No.2, Kuthuparamba

  5. 26-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 09-Oct-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 973/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Munsiff Court of Kuthuparamba dismissed Execution Petition No. 973/2025 filed by Mazhuppel Chits Private Limited against Yoosaf K for default. The petitioner and their counsel failed to appear for the hearing and did not produce required documents, leading the court to conclude the petitioner lacked intent to proceed with the execution petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case