Thadathil Clara vs Jose George — 487/2019
Case under Procedure Code \ Section U/s 26 O7 R1. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 04th April 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLKN220014202019
Filing Number
1749/2019
Filing Date
19-Dec-2019
Registration No
487/2019
Registration Date
19-Dec-2019
Court
Munsiffss Court Kuthuparamba
Judge
1-Munsiff/Jfcm No.2, Kuthuparamba
Decision Date
04-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 10-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Thadathil Clara
Adv. John Joseph
-
2.Thadathil Shaju
-
3.Thadathil Shiboy
-
4.Thadathil Saiju
Respondent(s)
-
1.Jose George
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-Apr-2026
Judgement
The Munsiff court ruled that OS 487/2019 (filed by Thadathil Clara, Shaju, and Shiboy against Jose George) is barred by res judicata and dismissed as unmaintainable, as the same property and parties were conclusively decided in earlier suits OS 218/2007 and OS 457/2014, which established Jose George's title and ownership. OS 337/2019 (Jose George's suit for injunction and damages against the defendants) was permitted to proceed on merits, as the damages claim constitutes a distinct relief not covered by prior adjudications. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-Apr-2026
Disposed
Munsiff/Jfcm No.2, Kuthuparamba
-
26-Mar-2026
call with connected case
Munsiff/Jfcm No.2, Kuthuparamba
-
19-Mar-2026
call with connected case
Munsiff/Jfcm No.2, Kuthuparamba
-
16-Mar-2026
Call on
Munsiff/Jfcm No.2, Kuthuparamba
-
12-Mar-2026
Call on
Munsiff/Jfcm No.2, Kuthuparamba
-
20-Feb-2026
Call on
Munsiff/Jfcm No.2, Kuthuparamba
-
13-Feb-2026
Call on
Munsiff/Jfcm No.2, Kuthuparamba
-
09-Feb-2026
Call on
Munsiff/Jfcm No.2, Kuthuparamba
-
05-Jan-2026
Call on
Munsiff/Jfcm No.2, Kuthuparamba
-
29-Nov-2025
Call on
Munsiff/Jfcm No.2, Kuthuparamba
-
29-Oct-2025
Call on
Munsiff/Jfcm No.2, Kuthuparamba
-
23-Oct-2025
Call on
Munsiff/Jfcm No.2, Kuthuparamba
-
19-Aug-2025
Call on
Munsiff/Jfcm No.2, Kuthuparamba
-
31-May-2025
Call on
Munsiff/Jfcm No.2, Kuthuparamba
-
27-Feb-2025
Call on
Munsiff/Jfcm No.2, Kuthuparamba
-
08-Jan-2025
Call on
Munsiff/Jfcm No.2, Kuthuparamba
-
04-Dec-2024
Call on
Munsiff/Jfcm No.2, Kuthuparamba
-
21-Nov-2024
Call on
Munsiff/Jfcm No.2, Kuthuparamba
-
24-Sep-2024
Call on
Munsiff/Jfcm No.2, Kuthuparamba
-
27-Jul-2024
Call on
Munsiff/Jfcm No.2, Kuthuparamba
-
25-Jul-2024
Call on
Munsiff/Jfcm No.2, Kuthuparamba
-
09-Jul-2024
Call on
Munsiff/Jfcm No.2, Kuthuparamba
-
06-Jul-2024
Call on
Munsiff/Jfcm No.2, Kuthuparamba
-
30-May-2024
Call on
Munsiff/Jfcm No.2, Kuthuparamba
-
18-Mar-2024
Call on
Munsiff/Jfcm No.2, Kuthuparamba
-
07-Feb-2024
Call on
Munsiff/Jfcm No.2, Kuthuparamba
-
25-Nov-2023
Pre trial steps
Munsiff/Jfcm No.2, Kuthuparamba
-
17-Oct-2023
Pre trial steps
Munsiff/Jfcm No.2, Kuthuparamba
-
08-Sep-2023
Pre trial steps
Munsiff/Jfcm No.2, Kuthuparamba
-
15-Jul-2023
For Steps
Munsiff/Jfcm No.2, Kuthuparamba
-
03-Jun-2023
For Steps
Munsiff/Jfcm No.2, Kuthuparamba
-
14-Mar-2023
Call on
-
17-Jan-2023
For Steps
-
20-Oct-2022
Call on
-
23-Aug-2022
For Steps
-
18-Jun-2022
For Steps
-
24-Mar-2022
Issues
-
25-Feb-2022
Report Of Mediator
-
05-Jan-2022
For appearence of plaintiff/defendent
-
08-Oct-2021
Written Statement
-
23-Jul-2021
Written Statement
-
20-May-2021
Written Statement
-
23-Jan-2021
Written Statement
-
18-Nov-2020
Written Statement
-
25-Aug-2020
Written Statement
-
18-Jun-2020
Written Statement
-
19-Mar-2020
Written Statement
-
26-Feb-2020
Written Statement
-
25-Jan-2020
Call on
-
19-Dec-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Dec-2019
Case filed
Registration No. 487/2019
The Munsiff court ruled that OS 487/2019 (filed by Thadathil Clara, Shaju, and Shiboy against Jose George) is barred by res judicata and dismissed as unmaintainable, as the same property and parties were conclusively decided in earlier suits OS 218/2007 and OS 457/2014, which established Jose George's title and ownership. OS 337/2019 (Jose George's suit for injunction and damages against the defendants) was permitted to proceed on merits, as the damages claim constitutes a distinct relief not covered by prior adjudications. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts