P.V.Sobha alias Sobhana vs K.K.Ammalu Advocate - Thankachan VP — 256/2019
Case under Procedure Code \ Section U/s26 O7 R1. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 26th March 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLKN220007442019
Filing Number
791/2019
Filing Date
17-07-2019
Registration No
256/2019
Registration Date
17-07-2019
Court
Munsiffss Court Kuthuparamba
Judge
1-Munsiff/JFCM No.2, Kuthuparamba
Decision Date
26th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
P.V.Sobha alias Sobhana
Adv. C.K.Lohithakshan and K.Roja
K.K Smitha
Adv. C.K Lohithakshan
Respondent(s)
K.K.Ammalu Advocate - Thankachan VP
K.K Balan
Adv. K.V.Pavithran
K.K Chandri
Adv. Thankachan VP,K.V.Pavithran
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Munsiff/JFCM No.2, Kuthuparamba
Disposed
Order/Judgement
Order/ Judgement
FOR HEARING
FOR HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 26-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 24-03-2026 | Order/Judgement |
| 19-03-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 18-03-2026 | FOR HEARING |
| 16-03-2026 | FOR HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Munsiff's court dismissed the partition suit, holding that the plaintiffs failed to establish that the first plaintiff was the legally wedded wife of deceased Krishnan or that the second plaintiff was his daughter, due to absent pleadings, lack of direct testimony, inconsistencies in evidence (pregnancy before marriage), and the suspicious origin of the marriage certificate in prior maintenance proceedings. Without proving the requisite legal relationships, the plaintiffs have no inheritance rights and thus no claim to partition the property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Munsiff's court dismissed the partition suit, holding that the plaintiffs failed to establish that the first plaintiff was the legally wedded wife of deceased Krishnan or that the second plaintiff was his daughter, due to absent pleadings, lack of direct testimony, inconsistencies in evidence (pregnancy before marriage), and the suspicious origin of the marriage certificate in prior maintenance proceedings. Without proving the requisite legal relationships, the plaintiffs have no inheritance rights and thus no claim to partition the property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts