Rajeev Nanu Nair vs R Prasad Advocate - V K Prabhakaran — 23/2023
Case under Kerala Buildings Lease and Rent Control Act 1965 Section 11(3). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 30th March 2026.
RCP - RENT CONTROL PETITION
CNR: KLKN220006392023
e-Filing Number
05-04-2023
Filing Number
661/2023
Filing Date
13-Apr-2023
Registration No
23/2023
Registration Date
13-Apr-2023
Court
Munsiffss Court Kuthuparamba
Judge
1-Munsiff/Jfcm No.2, Kuthuparamba
Decision Date
30-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 26-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Rajeev Nanu Nair
Adv. SHARESH KUMAR V M
Respondent(s)
-
1.R Prasad Advocate - V K Prabhakaran
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Summary of RCP No. 23/2023 The Rent Controller dismissed the petitioner's eviction petition under Section 11(3) of the Kerala Building Lease and Rent Control Act, finding the claimed "bona fide need" for his wife's tailoring business unproven. The court determined that the petitioner failed to disclose four vacant rooms in his possession (previously occupied by BSNL) and provided no special reasons for requiring the tenant's rented room, thereby undermining the genuineness of the need. The tenant was awarded litigation costs against the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Mar-2026
Disposed
Munsiff/Jfcm No.2, Kuthuparamba
-
23-Mar-2026
Order/Judgement
Munsiff/Jfcm No.2, Kuthuparamba
-
17-Mar-2026
For Hearing
Munsiff/Jfcm No.2, Kuthuparamba
-
13-Mar-2026
For Hearing
Munsiff/Jfcm No.2, Kuthuparamba
-
12-Mar-2026
Call on
Munsiff/Jfcm No.2, Kuthuparamba
-
11-Mar-2026
Call on
Munsiff/Jfcm No.2, Kuthuparamba
-
07-Mar-2026
Call on
Munsiff/Jfcm No.2, Kuthuparamba
-
25-Feb-2026
For Hearing
Munsiff/Jfcm No.2, Kuthuparamba
-
19-Feb-2026
Call on
Munsiff/Jfcm No.2, Kuthuparamba
-
11-Feb-2026
Return of summons
Munsiff/Jfcm No.2, Kuthuparamba
-
05-Feb-2026
For return of summons
Munsiff/Jfcm No.2, Kuthuparamba
-
27-Jan-2026
For return of summons
Munsiff/Jfcm No.2, Kuthuparamba
-
23-Jan-2026
For evidence
Munsiff/Jfcm No.2, Kuthuparamba
-
16-Jan-2026
For evidence
Munsiff/Jfcm No.2, Kuthuparamba
-
07-Jan-2026
Defendant/Respondent Evidence
Munsiff/Jfcm No.2, Kuthuparamba
-
05-Dec-2025
Listed For Trial
Munsiff/Jfcm No.2, Kuthuparamba
-
01-Dec-2025
Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence
Munsiff/Jfcm No.2, Kuthuparamba
-
13-Nov-2025
For commission report
Munsiff/Jfcm No.2, Kuthuparamba
-
30-Oct-2025
Listed For Trial
Munsiff/Jfcm No.2, Kuthuparamba
-
30-Oct-2025
Disposed
Munsiff/Jfcm No.2, Kuthuparamba
-
05-Nov-2024
OrderView PDF
-
05-Nov-2024
—
Munsiff/Jfcm No.2, Kuthuparamba
-
30-Oct-2024
Order/Judgement
Munsiff/Jfcm No.2, Kuthuparamba
-
26-Oct-2024
For evidence
Munsiff/Jfcm No.2, Kuthuparamba
-
07-Oct-2024
For evidence
Munsiff/Jfcm No.2, Kuthuparamba
-
29-Aug-2024
Listed For Trial
Munsiff/Jfcm No.2, Kuthuparamba
-
27-Jul-2024
Pre trial steps
Munsiff/Jfcm No.2, Kuthuparamba
-
27-Jun-2024
Pre trial steps
Munsiff/Jfcm No.2, Kuthuparamba
-
27-May-2024
Pre trial steps
Munsiff/Jfcm No.2, Kuthuparamba
-
11-Mar-2024
Report Of Mediator
Munsiff/Jfcm No.2, Kuthuparamba
-
05-Feb-2024
Report Of Mediator
Munsiff/Jfcm No.2, Kuthuparamba
-
19-Jan-2024
Report Of Mediator
Munsiff/Jfcm No.2, Kuthuparamba
-
02-Dec-2023
Report Of Mediator
Munsiff/Jfcm No.2, Kuthuparamba
-
28-Oct-2023
Report Of Mediator
Munsiff/Jfcm No.2, Kuthuparamba
-
21-Sep-2023
Report Of Mediator
Munsiff/Jfcm No.2, Kuthuparamba
-
14-Aug-2023
Pre trial steps
Munsiff/Jfcm No.2, Kuthuparamba
-
10-Jul-2023
For counter
Munsiff/Jfcm No.2, Kuthuparamba
-
02-Jun-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Apr-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 23/2023
Summary of RCP No. 23/2023 The Rent Controller dismissed the petitioner's eviction petition under Section 11(3) of the Kerala Building Lease and Rent Control Act, finding the claimed "bona fide need" for his wife's tailoring business unproven. The court determined that the petitioner failed to disclose four vacant rooms in his possession (previously occupied by BSNL) and provided no special reasons for requiring the tenant's rented room, thereby undermining the genuineness of the need. The tenant was awarded litigation costs against the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts