Naduthottathil Lisy, vs Urumbil Mathukutt — 102/2021
Case under Procedure Code \ Section OVII R 1. Status: For Hearing. Next hearing: 30th May 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLKN220002572021
Filing Number
278/2021
Filing Date
18-Feb-2021
Registration No
102/2021
Registration Date
18-Feb-2021
Court
Munsiffss Court Kuthuparamba
Judge
1-Munsiff/Jfcm No.2, Kuthuparamba
Last updated 25-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Naduthottathil Lisy,
Adv. K.Mukundan
Respondent(s)
-
1.Urumbil Mathukutt
Case History
-
30-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
20-May-2026
For Hearing
Munsiff/Jfcm No.2, Kuthuparamba
-
10-Apr-2026
For Hearing
Munsiff/Jfcm No.2, Kuthuparamba
-
06-Apr-2026
Report Of Mediator
Munsiff/Jfcm No.2, Kuthuparamba
-
12-Mar-2026
Report Of Mediator
Munsiff/Jfcm No.2, Kuthuparamba
-
26-Feb-2026
For appearence of plaintiff/defendent
Munsiff/Jfcm No.2, Kuthuparamba
-
05-Feb-2026
Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence
Munsiff/Jfcm No.2, Kuthuparamba
-
22-Nov-2025
Written Statement
Munsiff/Jfcm No.2, Kuthuparamba
-
22-Nov-2025
Disposed
Munsiff/Jfcm No.2, Kuthuparamba
-
30-Nov-2021
JudgementView PDF
Summary The suit for cancellation of a document was decreed in favor of the plaintiff. The court ordered cancellation of Sale Deed No. 1310/1997 dated 24.03.1997, finding that the plaintiff had executed the deed as security for a Rs. 1 lakh loan in 1997 but was deceived into signing a sale deed instead of an agreement for sale. The defendant was directed to pay costs of the suit, and a copy of the decree was to be sent to the Sub Registrar Office for necessary action. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Nov-2021
—
-
25-Nov-2021
Order/Judgement
-
01-Nov-2021
exparte evidence
-
01-Sep-2021
Issue Summons
-
16-Jul-2021
Issue Summons
-
05-Jun-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Feb-2021
Case filed
Registration No. 102/2021
Summary The suit for cancellation of a document was decreed in favor of the plaintiff. The court ordered cancellation of Sale Deed No. 1310/1997 dated 24.03.1997, finding that the plaintiff had executed the deed as security for a Rs. 1 lakh loan in 1997 but was deceived into signing a sale deed instead of an agreement for sale. The defendant was directed to pay costs of the suit, and a copy of the decree was to be sent to the Sub Registrar Office for necessary action. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts