M.K.Abdul Salim vs Mappilarkandy Rukhiya Advocate - K.Mukundan — 73/2018
Case under Procedure Code \ Section U/s26 O7R1. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed with cost. on 26th March 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLKN220002372018
Filing Number
238/2018
Filing Date
23-02-2018
Registration No
73/2018
Registration Date
23-02-2018
Court
Munsiffss Court Kuthuparamba
Judge
1-Munsiff/JFCM No.2, Kuthuparamba
Decision Date
26th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed with cost.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M.K.Abdul Salim
Adv. Janardhanan P K
Respondent(s)
Mappilarkandy Rukhiya Advocate - K.Mukundan
Yousuf
Adv. K.Mukundan
Salim C.P
Adv. K.V Anilkumar
Pathumma
Adv. CV Anil Prakash
Beebi
Adv. CV Anil Prakash
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Munsiff/JFCM No.2, Kuthuparamba
Disposed
Order/ Judgement
FOR HEARING
For evidence
Defendant/Respondent Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 26-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 24-03-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 16-03-2026 | FOR HEARING |
| 07-03-2026 | For evidence |
| 05-03-2026 | Defendant/Respondent Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Munsiff Court dismissed plaintiff M.K. Abdul Salim's suit seeking mandatory and prohibitory injunctions against alleged property encroachment. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish the identity of the disputed property (Schedule B) or prove possession thereof, which were essential foundational facts required to grant injunctive relief. Consequently, the court could not sustain the encroachment allegations and dismissed the suit, awarding litigation costs to defendants 4 and 5. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Munsiff Court dismissed plaintiff M.K. Abdul Salim's suit seeking mandatory and prohibitory injunctions against alleged property encroachment. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish the identity of the disputed property (Schedule B) or prove possession thereof, which were essential foundational facts required to grant injunctive relief. Consequently, the court could not sustain the encroachment allegations and dismissed the suit, awarding litigation costs to defendants 4 and 5. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts