Sarojini Amma.C.K vs Sreejitha.P.E Advocate - Satheesh Babu R — 94/2019
Case under Procedure Code \ Section U/s 26 O7 R1. Disposed: Uncontested--Settled in mediation on 16th March 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLKN220002362019
Filing Number
256/2019
Filing Date
08-03-2019
Registration No
94/2019
Registration Date
08-03-2019
Court
Munsiffss Court Kuthuparamba
Judge
1-Munsiff/JFCM No.2, Kuthuparamba
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Settled in mediation
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sarojini Amma.C.K
Adv. K.Mukundan, K.Mukundan
Latha C K @ Latha K Nair
Rajesh C K
Santhi C K
Respondent(s)
Sreejitha.P.E Advocate - Satheesh Babu R
Baburaj. C
Adv. Satheesh Babu R
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Munsiff/JFCM No.2, Kuthuparamba
Disposed
REPORT OF MEDIATOR
For settlement
REPORT OF MEDIATOR
For appearence of plaintiff/defendent
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | REPORT OF MEDIATOR |
| 03-03-2026 | For settlement |
| 21-02-2026 | REPORT OF MEDIATOR |
| 18-02-2026 | For appearence of plaintiff/defendent |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: OS 94/2019 The Munsiff Court of Kuthuparamba decreed an injunction suit based on a settlement reached through mediation between the plaintiffs (Sarojini Amma and family members) and defendants (Sreejitha and Baburaj). Rather than dismissing the suit after settlement, the court decreed it incorporating the mediation agreement as part of the judgment. The court reasoned that since the mediation agreement contained executable terms enforceable upon default and itself requested suit decree, dismissing it would prejudice the parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: OS 94/2019 The Munsiff Court of Kuthuparamba decreed an injunction suit based on a settlement reached through mediation between the plaintiffs (Sarojini Amma and family members) and defendants (Sreejitha and Baburaj). Rather than dismissing the suit after settlement, the court decreed it incorporating the mediation agreement as part of the judgment. The court reasoned that since the mediation agreement contained executable terms enforceable upon default and itself requested suit decree, dismissing it would prejudice the parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts