M.Usha, vs Vinodini.M. W/o Karunan Vadakkekaremmal house, P.O.Pinarayi — 99/2018
Case under Procedure Code \ Section U/s 26 O7 R1. Status: For commission report. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLKN220001562018
Next Hearing
16th June 2026
Filing Number
154/2018
Filing Date
09-02-2018
Registration No
99/2018
Registration Date
09-02-2018
Court
Munsiffss Court Kuthuparamba
Judge
1-Munsiff/JFCM No.2, Kuthuparamba
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M.Usha,
Adv. Roshin.K.
Respondent(s)
Vinodini.M. W/o Karunan Vadakkekaremmal house, P.O.Pinarayi
Vijayalakshmi M
Pankajam M
Paleri yesoda
Adv. MUKUNDAN K
Paleri sathi
Adv. MUKUNDAN K
Vasantha
Adv. MUKUNDAN K
Gowri
Adv. MUKUNDAN K
Balachandran
Adv. MUKUNDAN K
Sasi
Adv. MUKUNDAN K
Preetha
Adv. MUKUNDAN K
Dr.Gireesh
Jyothish
Adv. MUKUNDAN K
Rajeesh T M
Reshma T M
Adv. ZIRAJUDHEEN AYINAKATH KALLERI
Edappakath Muhammed Aslam
Ajmal Thayakath
Rafeeque C
Bushara CP
Muhammed Askar Pommanachi Valiyakath
Abdul Khadar E
Shahala Nasreen K
Muhammad Mansoor U C
Nisar Chovvakkay Fathima
Noushad Chovvakkaran
Sherin Shahana KK
Nabeesa Musthafa
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Munsiff/JFCM No.2, Kuthuparamba
For commission report
For commission report
For commission report
For commission report
Call on
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-04-2026 | For commission report |
| 16-03-2026 | For commission report |
| 28-02-2026 | For commission report |
| 13-02-2026 | For commission report |
| 12-02-2026 | Call on |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: M. Usha v. Vinodini M. and Others (OS 99/2018) Outcome: Suit DECREED - Preliminary decree for partition granted. The Munsiff of Kuthuparamba ruled that plaintiff M. Usha is entitled to a one-fifth share in the disputed property and directed division of the plaint schedule property into 5 equal shares, with one share allotted to the plaintiff and her co-heirs (defendants 2, 3, 13, 14). The court rejected defendants' arguments that Nanu (plaintiff's father) was excluded from succession, finding insufficient evidence to establish his exclusion. Subsequent transferee defendants (16-27) cannot claim better title, though their interests as bona fide purchasers will be considered during final decree proceedings. Each party bears their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: M. Usha v. Vinodini M. and Others (OS 99/2018) Outcome: Suit DECREED - Preliminary decree for partition granted. The Munsiff of Kuthuparamba ruled that plaintiff M. Usha is entitled to a one-fifth share in the disputed property and directed division of the plaint schedule property into 5 equal shares, with one share allotted to the plaintiff and her co-heirs (defendants 2, 3, 13, 14). The court rejected defendants' arguments that Nanu (plaintiff's father) was excluded from succession, finding insufficient evidence to establish his exclusion. Subsequent transferee defendants (16-27) cannot claim better title, though their interests as bona fide purchasers will be considered during final decree proceedings. Each party bears their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts