Karal Puthilon Vijayan vs Karal Puthilon Meenakshi Advocate - Prajeesh.P — 41/2019
Case under Procedure Code \ Section U/s 26 O7 R1. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 16th March 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLKN220000842019
Filing Number
91/2019
Filing Date
22-01-2019
Registration No
41/2019
Registration Date
25-01-2019
Court
Munsiffss Court Kuthuparamba
Judge
1-Munsiff/JFCM No.2, Kuthuparamba
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Karal Puthilon Vijayan
Adv. K.Mukundan
Respondent(s)
Karal Puthilon Meenakshi Advocate - Prajeesh.P
Karal Puthilon Sarojini
Karal Puthilon Madhusoodhanan
Adv. Prajeesh.P
Karal Puthilon Purushothaman
Adv. KV Pavithran
Karal Puthilon Komala Valli
Adv. Prajeesh.P
P.Radhamani
P. Jyothish
P.Ajith
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Munsiff/JFCM No.2, Kuthuparamba
Disposed
Order/ Judgement
Call on
Order/ Judgement
For Further hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 10-03-2026 | Call on |
| 05-03-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 04-03-2026 | For Further hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Karal Puthilon Vijayan v. Karal Puthilon Meenakshi & Others (OS 41/2019) The Munsiff court dismissed the plaintiff's partition suit, rejecting claims that a 1987 gift deed was fraudulently obtained. The court found the gift deed valid and accepted, noting inconsistencies in the fraud allegation and that the plaintiff failed to prove lack of acceptance as required under the Transfer of Property Act. Both parties bear their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Karal Puthilon Vijayan v. Karal Puthilon Meenakshi & Others (OS 41/2019) The Munsiff court dismissed the plaintiff's partition suit, rejecting claims that a 1987 gift deed was fraudulently obtained. The court found the gift deed valid and accepted, noting inconsistencies in the fraud allegation and that the plaintiff failed to prove lack of acceptance as required under the Transfer of Property Act. Both parties bear their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts