State of Kerala (Police) vs BIJU P — 1573/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2), 118(1), 3(5). Disposed: Uncontested--AQUITTED on 26th May 2026.
Cr.No(KNR-PS-Payyannur) - Payyannur PS
CNR: KLKN210051102025
e-Filing Number
25-09-2025
Filing Number
1149/2025
Filing Date
27-09-2025
Registration No
1573/2025
Registration Date
22-12-2025
Court
Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Payyannur
Judge
3-Judicial First Class Magistrate
Decision Date
26th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--AQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
1149
Police Station
Payyannur
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Kerala (Police)
Respondent(s)
BIJU P
PADMARAJAN K U
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Judicial First Class Magistrate
Disposed
Order/ Judgement
FOR HEARING
Hearing on Charge
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 26-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 21-05-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 13-05-2026 | FOR HEARING |
| 16-03-2026 | Hearing on Charge |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: CC 1573/2025 Decision: Both accused, Biju P and Padmarajan K U, were acquitted under Section 271(1) of BNSS of charges under Sections 126(2), 118(1) r/w 3(5) of BNS (wrongful restraint and voluntarily causing hurt). Key Reasoning: The sole prosecution witness (PW1/the complainant) turned hostile and failed to support the case, stating he did not know the assailants and that the matter had been settled. The prosecution abandoned remaining witnesses, providing no material evidence to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The court found insufficient evidence to establish the accusations against the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CC 1573/2025 Decision: Both accused, Biju P and Padmarajan K U, were acquitted under Section 271(1) of BNSS of charges under Sections 126(2), 118(1) r/w 3(5) of BNS (wrongful restraint and voluntarily causing hurt). Key Reasoning: The sole prosecution witness (PW1/the complainant) turned hostile and failed to support the case, stating he did not know the assailants and that the matter had been settled. The prosecution abandoned remaining witnesses, providing no material evidence to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The court found insufficient evidence to establish the accusations against the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts