SHO, Cherupuzha Ps vs Saravanan KP — 930/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 85. Disposed: Uncontested--AQUITTED on 31st March 2026.

CC - CALENDAR CASE

CNR: KLKN210033002025

Case disposed

Filing Number

3256/2025

Filing Date

10-07-2025

Registration No

930/2025

Registration Date

11-07-2025

Court

Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Payyannur

Judge

3-Judicial First Class Magistrate

Decision Date

31st March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--AQUITTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

388

Police Station

Cherupuzha

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 85
Crl.MP/1/2026 Classification : Bail Application Section Saravanan KPSHO, Cherupuzha Ps
Crl.MP/2/2026 Classification : Withdrawal Petition Section Saravanan KPSHO, Cherupuzha Ps

Petitioner(s)

SHO (Station House Officer), Cherupuzha Ps (Police Station)

Adv. Shaju T P APP

Respondent(s)

Saravanan KP

Hearing History

Judge: 3-Judicial First Class Magistrate

31-03-2026

Disposed

26-03-2026

FOR HEARING

19-03-2026

To summon witness

13-03-2026

Appearance of Accused

19-12-2025

Adjourned

Final Orders / Judgements

31-03-2026
Judgement

Case Summary: CC 930/2025 The Judicial First Class Magistrate, Payyannur acquitted Saravanan K.P. of charges under Section 85 of the BNS (cruelty in marriage). The sole prosecution witness—the complainant and accused's wife—turned hostile, testifying that marital issues had been resolved and they were living together again with no complaints against him. The court found insufficient evidence to prove the harassment allegations beyond reasonable doubt and discharged the accused under Section 271(1) BNSS. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CC 930/2025 The Judicial First Class Magistrate, Payyannur acquitted Saravanan K.P. of charges under Section 85 of the BNS (cruelty in marriage). The sole prosecution witness—the complainant and accused's wife—turned hostile, testifying that marital issues had been resolved and they were living together again with no complaints against him. The court found insufficient evidence to prove the harassment allegations beyond reasonable doubt and discharged the accused under Section 271(1) BNSS. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Payyannur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case