SHO, Cherupuzha Ps vs Saravanan KP — 930/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 85. Disposed: Uncontested--AQUITTED on 31st March 2026.
CC - CALENDAR CASE
CNR: KLKN210033002025
Filing Number
3256/2025
Filing Date
10-Jul-2025
Registration No
930/2025
Registration Date
11-Jul-2025
Court
Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Payyannur
Judge
3-Judicial First Class Magistrate
Decision Date
31-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--AQUITTED
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
388
Police Station
Cherupuzha
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHO (Station House Officer), Cherupuzha Ps (Police Station)
Adv. Shaju T P APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Saravanan KP
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
31-Mar-2026
JudgementView PDF
Case Summary: CC 930/2025 The Judicial First Class Magistrate, Payyannur acquitted Saravanan K.P. of charges under Section 85 of the BNS (cruelty in marriage). The sole prosecution witness—the complainant and accused's wife—turned hostile, testifying that marital issues had been resolved and they were living together again with no complaints against him. The court found insufficient evidence to prove the harassment allegations beyond reasonable doubt and discharged the accused under Section 271(1) BNSS. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
31-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
26-Mar-2026
For Hearing
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
19-Mar-2026
To summon witness
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
13-Mar-2026
Appearance of Accused
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
19-Dec-2025
Adjourned
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
08-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Jul-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 930/2025
Case Summary: CC 930/2025 The Judicial First Class Magistrate, Payyannur acquitted Saravanan K.P. of charges under Section 85 of the BNS (cruelty in marriage). The sole prosecution witness—the complainant and accused's wife—turned hostile, testifying that marital issues had been resolved and they were living together again with no complaints against him. The court found insufficient evidence to prove the harassment allegations beyond reasonable doubt and discharged the accused under Section 271(1) BNSS. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts