State of Kerala vs Valsala.P.P Advocate - P.P. Sandeepkumar, Payyannur — 953/2018
Case under Police Act, 1960 (Kerala) Section 117(d). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted u/s 248(1) CrPC on 31st March 2026.
CC - CALENDAR CASE
CNR: KLKN210027102018
Filing Number
953/2018
Filing Date
10-10-2018
Registration No
953/2018
Registration Date
10-10-2018
Court
Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Payyannur
Judge
3-Judicial First Class Magistrate
Decision Date
31st March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted u/s 248(1) CrPC
FIR Details
FIR Number
1536
Police Station
Pazhayangadi
Year
2016
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Kerala
Respondent(s)
Valsala.P.P Advocate - P.P. Sandeepkumar, Payyannur
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Judicial First Class Magistrate
Disposed
Order/ Judgement
FOR HEARING
Examination of the Accused U/S 313 Cr.PC
Call with MP
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 31-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 26-03-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 25-03-2026 | FOR HEARING |
| 19-03-2026 | Examination of the Accused U/S 313 Cr.PC |
| 17-03-2026 | Call with MP |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary The court acquitted Valsala P P under Section 248(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code, finding her not guilty of making a false statement to police under Section 117(d) of the Kerala Police Act. The court held that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused deliberately made a false statement with knowledge of its falsity and intent to mislead police, as critical evidence including call detail records, tower location data, and the factual investigation report were not produced in court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The court acquitted Valsala P P under Section 248(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code, finding her not guilty of making a false statement to police under Section 117(d) of the Kerala Police Act. The court held that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused deliberately made a false statement with knowledge of its falsity and intent to mislead police, as critical evidence including call detail records, tower location data, and the factual investigation report were not produced in court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts