State of Kerala vs Muhammed Hashir P — 912/2024

Case under Ipc \ Section 341,323r/w34. Disposed: Uncontested--AQUITTED on 31st March 2026.

CC - CALENDAR CASE

CNR: KLKN210026652024

Case disposed

Filing Number

2629/2024

Filing Date

08-08-2024

Registration No

912/2024

Registration Date

12-08-2024

Court

Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Payyannur

Judge

3-Judicial First Class Magistrate

Decision Date

31st March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--AQUITTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

175

Police Station

Pariyaram

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

IPC \ Section 341,323r/w34
Prohibition of Ragging Act, 1998 (Kerala) Section 4
Crl.MP/1/2026 Classification : Petition Section State of KeralaMuhammed Hashir P

Petitioner(s)

State of Kerala

Adv. Asst. Public Prosecutor

Respondent(s)

Muhammed Hashir P

Mazhar Manu VV

Hearing History

Judge: 3-Judicial First Class Magistrate

31-03-2026

Disposed

30-03-2026

Order/ Judgement

24-03-2026

FOR HEARING

12-03-2026

NBW to CWS

19-02-2026

To summon witness

Final Orders / Judgements

31-03-2026
Judgement

Case Summary The Judicial First Class Magistrate, Payyannur acquitted both accused (Muhammad Hashir P. and Mazhar Manu V V) of charges under IPC sections 341, 323 r/w 34 and the Kerala Prohibition of Ragging Act, section 4. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the complainant and key eyewitnesses turned hostile during trial and could not identify the assailants, and no material evidence was adduced linking the accused to the alleged unlawful restraint, hurt, and ragging incident. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Judicial First Class Magistrate, Payyannur acquitted both accused (Muhammad Hashir P. and Mazhar Manu V V) of charges under IPC sections 341, 323 r/w 34 and the Kerala Prohibition of Ragging Act, section 4. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the complainant and key eyewitnesses turned hostile during trial and could not identify the assailants, and no material evidence was adduced linking the accused to the alleged unlawful restraint, hurt, and ragging incident. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Payyannur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case