State of Kerala vs P.K.Subhash Advocate - D K Gopinathan, Payyannur — 495/2019

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 283,294(b),323. Disposed: Contested--AQUITTED on 30th April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CALENDAR CASE

CNR: KLKN210013772019

Filing Number

495/2019

Filing Date

14-May-2019

Registration No

495/2019

Registration Date

14-May-2019

Court

Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Payyannur

Judge

3-Judicial First Class Magistrate

Decision Date

30-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--AQUITTED

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

276

Police Station

Payyannur

Year

2019

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 283,294(b),323

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Kerala

    Adv. Asst. Public Prosecutor

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.P.K.Subhash Advocate - D K Gopinathan, Payyannur

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Apr-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Case Summary: State of Kerala v. P.K. Subhash (CC 495/2019) The Judicial First Class Magistrate, Payyannur, acquitted P.K. Subhash of charges under IPC sections 283 (obstruction), 323 (voluntarily causing hurt), and 294(b) (obscene language). The court found the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt because key witnesses—the complainant and eyewitnesses—turned hostile, material witnesses did not appear despite coercive measures, and official witnesses provided only procedural testimony without independent corroboration. The KSRTC bus seized during investigation was released to its owner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  4. 29-Apr-2026

    Order/Judgement

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  5. 28-Apr-2026

    For Hearing

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  6. 27-Apr-2026

    For appearance of the accused

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  7. 23-Apr-2026

    Examination of the Accused U/S 313 Cr.PC

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  8. 20-Apr-2026

    Show cause to SHO

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  9. 16-Apr-2026

    Await summons

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  10. 25-Mar-2026

    Show cause to SHO

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  11. 13-Mar-2026

    Memo to SHO

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  12. 19-Feb-2026

    Memo to SHO

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  13. 21-Jan-2026

    Repeat Summons

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  14. 07-Jan-2026

    Memo to SHO

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  15. 21-Nov-2025

    NBW to Cws

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  16. 24-Oct-2025

    82-83 steps

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  17. 29-Sep-2025

    Repeat Summons

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  18. 22-Aug-2025

    Repeat NBW

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  19. 21-Jul-2025

    NBW to Cws

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  20. 03-Jun-2025

    NBW to Cws

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  21. 22-Apr-2025

    Repeat Summons

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  22. 13-Feb-2025

    Await summons

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  23. 18-Dec-2024

    To summon witness

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  24. 08-Nov-2024

    82 Steps To Witness

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  25. 24-Oct-2024

    Repeat NBW

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  26. 03-Oct-2024

    Repeat NBW

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  27. 31-Jul-2024

    Issue NBW

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  28. 10-Jul-2024

    To summon witness

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  29. 03-Jul-2024

    call on

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  30. 20-May-2024

    To summon witness

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  31. 05-Mar-2024

    NBW to Cws

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  32. 01-Dec-2023

    For evidence

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  33. 20-Oct-2023

    No sitting notified

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  34. 16-Oct-2023

    Referred to Mediator

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  35. 16-Aug-2023

    No sitting notified

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  36. 05-Jul-2023

    To summon witness

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  37. 03-May-2023

    For settlement

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  38. 30-Mar-2023

    Memo to SHO

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  39. 21-Feb-2023

    Await NBW

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  40. 17-Jan-2023

    NBW to Cws

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  41. 13-Sep-2022

    Adjourned

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  42. 11-Aug-2022

    To summon witness

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  43. 05-Jul-2022

    call on

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  44. 17-Jan-2022

    Adjourned

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  45. 12-Oct-2021

    Adjourned

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  46. 17-Jun-2021

    Adjourned

  47. 16-Mar-2021

    Adjourned

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  48. 18-Dec-2020

    Adjourned

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  49. 11-Sep-2020

    Adjourned

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  50. 19-Jun-2020

    Adjourned

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  51. 07-Mar-2020

    No sitting notified

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  52. 29-Nov-2019

    Adjourned

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  53. 01-Oct-2019

    Adjourned

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  54. 17-Jun-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  55. 14-May-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. 495/2019

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Kerala v. P.K. Subhash (CC 495/2019) The Judicial First Class Magistrate, Payyannur, acquitted P.K. Subhash of charges under IPC sections 283 (obstruction), 323 (voluntarily causing hurt), and 294(b) (obscene language). The court found the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt because key witnesses—the complainant and eyewitnesses—turned hostile, material witnesses did not appear despite coercive measures, and official witnesses provided only procedural testimony without independent corroboration. The KSRTC bus seized during investigation was released to its owner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case