State of Kerala vs Deepu K V Advocate - K Vijayakumar — 657/2021

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,294(b),506(i)r/w34. Disposed: Uncontested--AQUITTED on 30th May 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CALENDAR CASE

CNR: KLKN210011362021

Filing Number

657/2021

Filing Date

08-Oct-2021

Registration No

657/2021

Registration Date

08-Oct-2021

Court

Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Payyannur

Judge

3-Judicial First Class Magistrate

Decision Date

30-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--AQUITTED

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

116

Police Station

Payyannur

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,294(b),506(i)r/w34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Kerala

    Adv. Asst. Public Prosecutor

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Deepu K V Advocate - K Vijayakumar

  2. 2.Rajeesh P R

    Adv. K Vijayakumar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-May-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Summary of Case 657/2021 The court acquitted both accused (Deepu K V and Rajeesh P R) of charges under IPC sections 341, 323, 294(b), and 506(i) read with section 34, finding the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. Key factors included: unexplained 6-day delay in lodging the FIR, admitted prior enmity between parties, medical evidence showing only minor contusion inconsistent with alleged assault, admission that another hospital certificate attributed injuries to a bike accident, absence of independent witness corroboration (with the sole eyewitness turning hostile), and interested testimony from related complainants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-May-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  4. 29-May-2026

    Order/ Judgement

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  5. 25-May-2026

    For further hearing

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  6. 18-May-2026

    For further hearing

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  7. 28-Apr-2026

    For further hearing

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  8. 13-Apr-2026

    Adjourned

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  9. 26-Mar-2026

    For further hearing

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  10. 16-Mar-2026

    For further hearing

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  11. 24-Feb-2026

    For further hearing

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  12. 21-Feb-2026

    Adjourned

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  13. 28-Jan-2026

    For further hearing

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  14. 14-Jan-2026

    For further hearing

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  15. 29-Dec-2025

    For further hearing

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  16. 09-Dec-2025

    For further hearing

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  17. 08-Dec-2025

    For Hearing

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  18. 27-Nov-2025

    For Hearing

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  19. 05-Nov-2025

    For Hearing

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  20. 21-Oct-2025

    Adjourned

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  21. 14-Oct-2025

    For Hearing

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  22. 25-Sep-2025

    For Hearing

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  23. 03-Sep-2025

    For Hearing

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  24. 19-Aug-2025

    For Hearing

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  25. 14-Aug-2025

    call on

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  26. 25-Jul-2025

    For Hearing

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  27. 23-Jun-2025

    For Hearing

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  28. 26-May-2025

    Defence Evidence

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  29. 08-May-2025

    Examination of the Accused U/S 313 Cr.PC

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  30. 30-Apr-2025

    Examination of the Accused U/S 313 Cr.PC

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  31. 03-Apr-2025

    Examination of the Accused U/S 313 Cr.PC

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  32. 22-Mar-2025

    Examination of the Accused U/S 313 Cr.PC

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  33. 17-Feb-2025

    Examination of the Accused U/S 313 Cr.PC

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  34. 27-Jan-2025

    Examination of the Accused U/S 313 Cr.PC

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  35. 15-Jan-2025

    Examination of the Accused U/S 313 Cr.PC

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  36. 02-Dec-2024

    Await steps

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  37. 01-Nov-2024

    82 Steps To Witness

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  38. 08-Oct-2024

    Memo to SHO

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  39. 05-Aug-2024

    For Steps

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  40. 19-Jun-2024

    Repeat NBW

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  41. 13-May-2024

    NBW to Cws

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  42. 12-Mar-2024

    To summon witness

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  43. 16-Feb-2024

    To summon witness

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  44. 01-Jan-2024

    NBW to Cws

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  45. 08-Nov-2023

    NBW to Cws

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  46. 13-Sep-2023

    Repeat NBW

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  47. 13-Jul-2023

    Repeat NBW

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  48. 22-May-2023

    NBW to Cws

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  49. 03-Apr-2023

    Bound Over

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  50. 16-Feb-2023

    call on

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  51. 13-Dec-2022

    Issue Summons

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  52. 04-Jul-2022

    For recording plea

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  53. 01-Dec-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  54. 08-Oct-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 657/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 657/2021 The court acquitted both accused (Deepu K V and Rajeesh P R) of charges under IPC sections 341, 323, 294(b), and 506(i) read with section 34, finding the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. Key factors included: unexplained 6-day delay in lodging the FIR, admitted prior enmity between parties, medical evidence showing only minor contusion inconsistent with alleged assault, admission that another hospital certificate attributed injuries to a bike accident, absence of independent witness corroboration (with the sole eyewitness turning hostile), and interested testimony from related complainants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case