State of Kerala vs Rajeevan Advocate - Ranjana.G.K — 207/2019
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 286,337,338. Disposed: Uncontested--Acquitted u/s 248(1) CrPC on 29th April 2026.
CC - CALENDAR CASE
CNR: KLKN210005732019
Filing Number
207/2019
Filing Date
23-02-2019
Registration No
207/2019
Registration Date
23-02-2019
Court
Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Payyannur
Judge
3-Judicial First Class Magistrate
Decision Date
29th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Acquitted u/s 248(1) CrPC
FIR Details
FIR Number
277
Police Station
Peringome
Year
2018
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Kerala
Adv. Asst. Public Prosecutor
Respondent(s)
Rajeevan Advocate - Ranjana.G.K
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Judicial First Class Magistrate
Disposed
Order/ Judgement
call on
Await steps
Await steps
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 29-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 27-04-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 21-04-2026 | call on |
| 12-03-2026 | Await steps |
| 20-02-2026 | Await steps |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Judicial First Class Magistrate, Payyannur acquitted Rajeevan of charges under IPC sections 286, 337, 338 and the Explosive Substances Act section 9(B)(1)(b) for illegally storing explosives that allegedly caused injuries during an incident on 21.09.2018. The court found the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt as key material witnesses did not appear despite coercive measures, leaving only the investigating officer's testimony without substantive evidence of the accused's identity or negligence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Judicial First Class Magistrate, Payyannur acquitted Rajeevan of charges under IPC sections 286, 337, 338 and the Explosive Substances Act section 9(B)(1)(b) for illegally storing explosives that allegedly caused injuries during an incident on 21.09.2018. The court found the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt as key material witnesses did not appear despite coercive measures, leaving only the investigating officer's testimony without substantive evidence of the accused's identity or negligence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts