Shylaja K P vs Sreekumar K P — 231/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section OrderVIIrule1. Status: Call with IA. Next hearing: 03rd July 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLKN200005352024
e-Filing Number
03-12-2024
Filing Number
524/2024
Filing Date
03-Dec-2024
Registration No
231/2024
Registration Date
03-Dec-2024
Court
Munsiff Court, Payyannur
Judge
2-Munsiff
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Shylaja K P
Adv. HAMZA KUTTY E P
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sreekumar K P
Case History
-
03-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
29-May-2026
Call with IA
Munsiff
-
07-Apr-2026
Call with IA
Munsiff
-
13-Mar-2026
Call with IA
Munsiff
-
12-Jan-2026
For vakalath
Munsiff
-
19-Nov-2025
Call with IA
Munsiff
-
27-Oct-2025
Call with IA
Munsiff
-
09-Sep-2025
For commission report
Munsiff
-
18-Jul-2025
For T.R
Munsiff
-
16-Jun-2025
Call with IA
Munsiff
-
04-Mar-2025
For Steps
Munsiff
-
28-Jan-2025
JudgementView PDF
Case 231/2024 Summary: Shylaja K.P. filed a partition suit against her cousin Sreekumar K.P. for equal division of jointly-owned property (24.8 cents in Peringome). The defendant failed to appear despite being called, and the case proceeded ex-parte. The court found the plaintiff's claim established through her affidavit and documentary evidence (joint purchase deed from 2003, legal notice, and postal receipt), with defendant's non-response strengthening her position. The court granted a preliminary decree dividing the property into two equal shares and allotting one share to the plaintiff, with suit costs borne by the estate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
28-Jan-2025
Restored
Munsiff
-
28-Jan-2025
For Steps
Munsiff
-
28-Jan-2025
Disposed
Munsiff
-
09-Jan-2025
For Hearing
Munsiff
-
06-Jan-2025
exparte evidence
Munsiff
-
03-Dec-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Dec-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 231/2024
Case 231/2024 Summary: Shylaja K.P. filed a partition suit against her cousin Sreekumar K.P. for equal division of jointly-owned property (24.8 cents in Peringome). The defendant failed to appear despite being called, and the case proceeded ex-parte. The court found the plaintiff's claim established through her affidavit and documentary evidence (joint purchase deed from 2003, legal notice, and postal receipt), with defendant's non-response strengthening her position. The court granted a preliminary decree dividing the property into two equal shares and allotting one share to the plaintiff, with suit costs borne by the estate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts