Kabdulrahimanhaji vs T.K.Gireeshan Advocate - K.Vijayakumar, Anusha.K, K.Vijayakumar, Anusha.K, K.Vijayakumar, Anusha.KMithra GR,, K.Vijayakumar, Anusha.KMithra GR,ATHIRA T V,, K.Vijayakumar, Anusha.KMithra GR,ATHIRA T V,SREELAKSHMI SAHAJAN, — 28/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 11(i),11(3),11(4)(i). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 13th March 2026.
RCP - RENT CONTROL PETITION
CNR: KLKN200004792023
e-Filing Number
25-08-2023
Filing Number
456/2023
Filing Date
05-09-2023
Registration No
28/2023
Registration Date
11-09-2023
Court
Munsiff Court, Payyannur
Judge
2-Munsiff
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Kabdulrahimanhaji
Adv. MAHESH V RmKRISHNAN
Respondent(s)
T.K.Gireeshan Advocate - K.Vijayakumar, Anusha.K, K.Vijayakumar, Anusha.K, K.Vijayakumar, Anusha.KMithra GR,, K.Vijayakumar, Anusha.KMithra GR,ATHIRA T V,, K.Vijayakumar, Anusha.KMithra GR,ATHIRA T V,SREELAKSHMI SAHAJAN,
M.Suresan
Adv. K.Vijayakumar, Anusha.K,Vijayakumar Mithra GR ATHIRA T V SREELAKSHMI SAHAJAN
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Munsiff
Disposed
FOR HEARING
Listed to
Disposed
Call on
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | FOR HEARING |
| 28-02-2026 | Listed to |
| 28-02-2026 | Disposed |
| 17-06-2025 | Call on |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Rent Control Court (Munsiff), Payyannur allowed the petitioner's petition under the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965. The court found that the respondents unlawfully transferred the rented room without the petitioner's consent, violating the lease agreement terms. The court ordered respondents to surrender vacant possession within two months and directed them to pay costs, recognizing the petitioner's bona fide need for the room for his unemployed son's business purposes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The Rent Control Court (Munsiff), Payyannur allowed the petitioner's petition under the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965. The court found that the respondents unlawfully transferred the rented room without the petitioner's consent, violating the lease agreement terms. The court ordered respondents to surrender vacant possession within two months and directed them to pay costs, recognizing the petitioner's bona fide need for the room for his unemployed son's business purposes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts