Puthalath Musthafa vs Kuthirummal Abdul Salam — 28/2019
Case under Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965 (Kerala) Section 11(4) (iv). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 10th April 2026.
RCP - RENT CONTROL PETITION
CNR: KLKN200004192019
Filing Number
28/2019
Filing Date
05-11-2019
Registration No
28/2019
Registration Date
15-11-2019
Court
Munsiff Court, Payyannur
Judge
2-Munsiff
Decision Date
10th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Puthalath Musthafa
Adv. E K Ramakrishnan
Peedikayil Ibrahim Kutty
Adv. Adv E K Ramakrishnan
Udinoor Peediakayil Abdul Majeed
Adv. Adv E K Ramakrishnan
Udinoor Peedikayil Ismail
Adv. Adv E K Ramakrishnan
Udinoor Peedikayil Ismail
Udinoor Peedikayil Muhammed Sabir
Respondent(s)
Kuthirummal Abdul Salam
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Munsiff
Disposed
For Judgment
For Judgment
Order/ Judgement
For further hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 06-04-2026 | For Judgment |
| 31-03-2026 | For Judgment |
| 30-03-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 18-03-2026 | For further hearing |
Interim Orders
CASE SUMMARY: RCP 28/2019 The Rent Control Court allowed the petitioners' petition under Section 11(4)(iv) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act. The petitioners, who own commercial rooms in Payyanur, sought eviction of the respondent (tenant since 2018) to demolish the dilapidated structure and construct a modern building with municipal approval. The respondent failed to appear for evidence despite notice, and the court found the petitioners' case proved through undisputed documents including building permits. The court directed the respondent to vacate within one month or face court-ordered execution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
CASE SUMMARY: RCP 28/2019 The Rent Control Court allowed the petitioners' petition under Section 11(4)(iv) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act. The petitioners, who own commercial rooms in Payyanur, sought eviction of the respondent (tenant since 2018) to demolish the dilapidated structure and construct a modern building with municipal approval. The respondent failed to appear for evidence despite notice, and the court found the petitioners' case proved through undisputed documents including building permits. The court directed the respondent to vacate within one month or face court-ordered execution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts