Tomy J Cherkot vs Melath Suresh — 29/2018
Case under Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965 (Kerala) Section S 11(8). Status: Call with IA. Next hearing: 26th May 2026.
RCP - RENT CONTROL PETITION
CNR: KLKN200002142018
Next Hearing
26th May 2026
Filing Number
29/2018
Filing Date
06-07-2018
Registration No
29/2018
Registration Date
11-07-2018
Court
Munsiff Court, Payyannur
Judge
2-Munsiff
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Tomy J Cherkot
Adv. K.Vijayakumar, Mithra G.R
Elemma Parakattel
Adv. K.Vijayakumar, Mithra G.R
Respondent(s)
Melath Suresh
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Munsiff
Call with IA
For commission report
For commission report
For commission report
Orders in IA
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-05-2026 | Call with IA |
| 10-04-2026 | For commission report |
| 06-04-2026 | For commission report |
| 26-03-2026 | For commission report |
| 24-03-2026 | Orders in IA |
Interim Orders
Summary: The Rent Control Court/Munsiff of Payyannur partially allowed the petition for joint trial of multiple rent control cases. Six cases (RCP 29/2018, 30/2018, 31/2018, 34/2018, 43/2018, and 44/2018)—all involving Section 11(8) relief for additional accommodation—were ordered to be tried together with RCP 29/2018 as the leading case. However, three cases (RCP 37/2018, 38/2018, 39/2018) involving additional Section 11(4)(i) grounds (unauthorized subletting) were ordered to be tried separately to avoid prejudice to the parties and delay in proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Rent Control Court/Munsiff of Payyannur partially allowed the petition for joint trial of multiple rent control cases. Six cases (RCP 29/2018, 30/2018, 31/2018, 34/2018, 43/2018, and 44/2018)—all involving Section 11(8) relief for additional accommodation—were ordered to be tried together with RCP 29/2018 as the leading case. However, three cases (RCP 37/2018, 38/2018, 39/2018) involving additional Section 11(4)(i) grounds (unauthorized subletting) were ordered to be tried separately to avoid prejudice to the parties and delay in proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts