Madambillath Nelli Valappil Ameer Ali (Died) vs C Janardanan — 29/2005
Case under Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965 (Kerala) Section section5. Status: Call with connected case. Next hearing: 20th June 2026.
RCP - RENT CONTROL PETITION
CNR: KLKN200000132005
Next Hearing
20th June 2026
Filing Number
29/2005
Filing Date
30-05-2005
Registration No
29/2005
Registration Date
30-05-2005
Court
Munsiff Court, Payyannur
Judge
2-Munsiff
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Madambillath Nelli Valappil Ameer Ali (Died)
Adv. Vijayakumar
Madambillath Nelli Valappil Moideen
Adv. Vijayakumar
Madambillath Nelli Valappil Mariyambi
Adv. Vijayakumar
Kattoor Kadeeja
Adv. Vijayakumar
Respondent(s)
C Janardanan
Thayyil Purayil Fathima
Assarudhin
Muhammed Aslam
Haneesa
Muhammed Ajeer (Minor)
K.V. Damodaran
K.V.Madhavi
Muralidharan.K.V.
Jayamala.K.V.
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Munsiff
Call with connected case
Call with connected case
Call with connected case
Call with connected case
Call with connected case
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-06-2026 | Call with connected case |
| 29-05-2026 | Call with connected case |
| 22-05-2026 | Call with connected case |
| 07-04-2026 | Call with connected case |
| 06-04-2026 | Call with connected case |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY: RCP 29/2005 - Rent Control Petition Case: Rent Control Petition (RCP) No. 29/2005 Court: Rent Controller (Munsiff), Payyannur Date of Order: 9th April 2019 Petitioners: Madambillath Nelli Valappil Ameer Ali (Deceased), Madambillath Nelli Valappil Moideen, and Madambillath Nelli Valappil Mariyambi (along with legal representatives and other co-owners) Respondent: C. Janardanan (LIC Development Officer) and supplemental respondents including Thayyil Purayil Fathima and others Relief Granted: Fair rent fixed at ₹8,000 per month for room No. PM.XXII/782 (ground floor), effective from the date of petition. Tenants directed to pay this revised rent with costs awarded to petitioner. Key Findings: - Rent control petitions for fair rent fixation are maintainable despite transfer of co-owner shares during pendency - Court properly considers inflation guidelines from High Court precedents (2004 (1) KLT 767) even without explicit pleading - Inflation averaging 8% annually, significant location commercial value, and high accommodation demand justify rent enhancement - Previous rent (₹250/month) was meager and inadequate - All petitions in RCP 21-30/2005 similarly allowed with individually fixed fair rents ranging from ₹2,000 to ₹8,000 per month This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY: RCP 29/2005 - Rent Control Petition Case: Rent Control Petition (RCP) No. 29/2005 Court: Rent Controller (Munsiff), Payyannur Date of Order: 9th April 2019 Petitioners: Madambillath Nelli Valappil Ameer Ali (Deceased), Madambillath Nelli Valappil Moideen, and Madambillath Nelli Valappil Mariyambi (along with legal representatives and other co-owners) Respondent: C. Janardanan (LIC Development Officer) and supplemental respondents including Thayyil Purayil Fathima and others Relief Granted: Fair rent fixed at ₹8,000 per month for room No. PM.XXII/782 (ground floor), effective from the date of petition. Tenants directed to pay this revised rent with costs awarded to petitioner. Key Findings: - Rent control petitions for fair rent fixation are maintainable despite transfer of co-owner shares during pendency - Court properly considers inflation guidelines from High Court precedents (2004 (1) KLT 767) even without explicit pleading - Inflation averaging 8% annually, significant location commercial value, and high accommodation demand justify rent enhancement - Previous rent (₹250/month) was meager and inadequate - All petitions in RCP 21-30/2005 similarly allowed with individually fixed fair rents ranging from ₹2,000 to ₹8,000 per month This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts