Sujatha.T.A vs Balamani T.A Advocate - Sajith Kumar S — 73/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: For commission report. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLKN190003452022
Filing Number
276/2022
Filing Date
22-Oct-2022
Registration No
73/2022
Registration Date
26-Oct-2022
Court
Sub Court, Payyannur
Judge
1-Sub Judge
Last updated 25-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sujatha.T.A
Adv. DINESH GOPALAKRISHNAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.Balamani T.A Advocate - Sajith Kumar S
-
2.Sulekha.T.A
Adv. Vijayakumar K
-
3.Sunil Kumar T.A
Adv. Sajith Kumar S
-
4.Kavitha.T.A
Adv. Sajith Kumar S
Case History
-
08-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
12-Mar-2026
For commission report
Sub Judge
-
10-Feb-2026
For commission report
Sub Judge
-
29-Jan-2026
call on
Sub Judge
-
29-Nov-2025
Take Steps
Sub Judge
-
25-Nov-2025
For Order
Sub Judge
-
13-Nov-2025
For counter
Sub Judge
-
09-Oct-2025
return of notice
Sub Judge
-
06-Oct-2025
Disposed
Sub Judge
-
29-Sep-2025
For Steps
Sub Judge
-
22-Aug-2025
For Steps
Sub Judge
-
24-May-2025
For Steps
Sub Judge
-
20-Mar-2025
For Steps
Sub Judge
-
17-Feb-2025
For Steps
Sub Judge
-
14-Jan-2025
For Steps
Sub Judge
-
26-Nov-2024
JudgementView PDF
SUMMARY: The Subordinate Judge of Payyannur issued a preliminary decree allowing the partition suit. The court ordered the scheduled property be partitioned into 5 equal shares (1/5th each) among the plaintiff and four defendants by metes and bounds. Additionally, the residential building on the property was allotted to Defendant 2 (Suleksha) based on equitable principles, as she has resided there for 15 years while other co-owners live elsewhere, subject to property valuation at the final decree stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
26-Nov-2024
—
Sub Judge
-
23-Nov-2024
Order/Judgement
Sub Judge
-
14-Nov-2024
Order/Judgement
Sub Judge
-
07-Nov-2024
Order/Judgement
Sub Judge
-
30-Oct-2024
Order/Judgement
Sub Judge
-
24-Oct-2024
Order/Judgement
Sub Judge
-
17-Oct-2024
Order/Judgement
Sub Judge
-
11-Oct-2024
Order/Judgement
Sub Judge
-
30-Sep-2024
Order/Judgement
Sub Judge
-
28-Sep-2024
Order/Judgement
Sub Judge
-
24-Sep-2024
Order/Judgement
Sub Judge
-
09-Sep-2024
Order/Judgement
Sub Judge
-
04-Sep-2024
Order/Judgement
Sub Judge
-
30-Aug-2024
For Hearing
Sub Judge
-
29-Aug-2024
For Hearing
Sub Judge
-
27-Aug-2024
For Hearing
Sub Judge
-
22-Aug-2024
For Hearing
Sub Judge
-
21-Aug-2024
For Hearing
Sub Judge
-
19-Aug-2024
For Hearing
Sub Judge
-
17-Aug-2024
For evidence
Sub Judge
-
07-Aug-2024
For evidence
Sub Judge
-
02-Aug-2024
Listed To
Sub Judge
-
22-Jun-2024
Listed To
Sub Judge
-
19-Jun-2024
Bcf and steps
Sub Judge
-
27-May-2024
For Issues
Sub Judge
-
26-Mar-2024
For Report
Sub Judge
-
19-Mar-2024
Referred to Mediator
Sub Judge
-
27-Nov-2023
Appearance of Partie
Sub Judge
-
14-Aug-2023
Written Statement
Sub Judge
-
04-Jan-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Oct-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 73/2022
SUMMARY: The Subordinate Judge of Payyannur issued a preliminary decree allowing the partition suit. The court ordered the scheduled property be partitioned into 5 equal shares (1/5th each) among the plaintiff and four defendants by metes and bounds. Additionally, the residential building on the property was allotted to Defendant 2 (Suleksha) based on equitable principles, as she has resided there for 15 years while other co-owners live elsewhere, subject to property valuation at the final decree stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts