Sujatha.T.A vs Balamani T.A Advocate - Sajith Kumar S — 73/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: For commission report. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLKN190003452022

For commission report

Next Hearing

08th June 2026

Filing Number

276/2022

Filing Date

22-10-2022

Registration No

73/2022

Registration Date

26-10-2022

Court

Sub Court, Payyannur

Judge

1-Sub Judge

Acts & Sections

Civil Procedure Code Section 26
IA/1/2024 Classification : Petition To Remove From List Section Sujatha.T.A
IA/2/2024 Classification : Application To Receive Documents Section Sujatha.T.ASulekha.T.A
IA/3/2025 Classification : Correction Of Order/Interim Order/Judgment Section Sujatha.T.ABalamani T.A
IA/1/2026 Classification : Advance Application Section Sujatha.T.ABalamani T.A
IA(FDA)/1/2026 Classification : Final Decree Application Section Sujatha.T.ABalamani T.A
IA/2/2026 Classification : Commission Application Section Sujatha.T.ABalamani T.A

Petitioner(s)

Sujatha.T.A

Adv. DINESH GOPALAKRISHNAN

Respondent(s)

Balamani T.A Advocate - Sajith Kumar S

Sulekha.T.A

Adv. Vijayakumar K

Sunil Kumar T.A

Adv. Sajith Kumar S

Kavitha.T.A

Adv. Sajith Kumar S

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Sub Judge

12-03-2026

For commission report

10-02-2026

For commission report

29-01-2026

call on

29-11-2025

Take Steps

25-11-2025

For Order

Interim Orders

26-11-2024
Judgement

SUMMARY: The Subordinate Judge of Payyannur issued a preliminary decree allowing the partition suit. The court ordered the scheduled property be partitioned into 5 equal shares (1/5th each) among the plaintiff and four defendants by metes and bounds. Additionally, the residential building on the property was allotted to Defendant 2 (Suleksha) based on equitable principles, as she has resided there for 15 years while other co-owners live elsewhere, subject to property valuation at the final decree stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY: The Subordinate Judge of Payyannur issued a preliminary decree allowing the partition suit. The court ordered the scheduled property be partitioned into 5 equal shares (1/5th each) among the plaintiff and four defendants by metes and bounds. Additionally, the residential building on the property was allotted to Defendant 2 (Suleksha) based on equitable principles, as she has resided there for 15 years while other co-owners live elsewhere, subject to property valuation at the final decree stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Sub Court, Payyannur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case