Marippurath Joseph vs Joseph Veliyamkulathel — 44/2011

Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

AS - CIVIL APPEAL

CNR: KLKN190001812011

Filing Number

44/2011

Filing Date

22-Jun-2011

Registration No

44/2011

Registration Date

11-Jul-2011

Court

Sub Court, Payyannur

Judge

1-Sub Judge

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 25-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Marippurath Joseph

    Adv. A.V.Kesavan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Joseph Veliyamkulathel

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Summary: The appellate court dismissed the plaintiff's appeal and upheld the trial court's dismissal of an injunction suit. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish his right over the disputed road (Plaint B schedule) or its proper identity, as his evidence was inconsistent with his pleadings and contradicted his own claims in the plaint. Without proving his legal right to the road, the plaintiff was not entitled to the injunctive relief sought against the defendant's alleged encroachment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Sub Judge

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Order/ Judgement

    Sub Judge

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Order/ Judgement

    Sub Judge

  6. 03-Mar-2026

    Order/ Judgement

    Sub Judge

  7. 24-Feb-2026

    For further hearing

    Sub Judge

  8. 20-Feb-2026

    For further hearing

    Sub Judge

  9. 12-Feb-2026

    For Hearing

    Sub Judge

  10. 07-Feb-2026

    Order/ Judgement

    Sub Judge

  11. 29-Jan-2026

    For further hearing

    Sub Judge

  12. 23-Jan-2026

    For further hearing

    Sub Judge

  13. 14-Jan-2026

    For Hearing

    Sub Judge

  14. 10-Dec-2025

    Listed To

    Sub Judge

  15. 20-Nov-2025

    For Hearing

    Sub Judge

  16. 23-Sep-2025

    No sitting notified

    Sub Judge

  17. 27-Jun-2025

    For further hearing

    Sub Judge

  18. 26-May-2025

    For further hearing

    Sub Judge

  19. 11-Apr-2025

    For further hearing

    Sub Judge

  20. 10-Apr-2025

    Order/ Judgement

    Sub Judge

  21. 05-Apr-2025

    Order/ Judgement

    Sub Judge

  22. 29-Mar-2025

    Order/ Judgement

    Sub Judge

  23. 28-Mar-2025

    Order/ Judgement

    Sub Judge

  24. 26-Mar-2025

    Order/ Judgement

    Sub Judge

  25. 20-Mar-2025

    Order/ Judgement

    Sub Judge

  26. 13-Mar-2025

    Order/ Judgement

    Sub Judge

  27. 10-Mar-2025

    For further hearing

    Sub Judge

  28. 05-Mar-2025

    For Hearing

    Sub Judge

  29. 22-Feb-2025

    For Hearing

    Sub Judge

  30. 16-Jan-2025

    For Hearing

    Sub Judge

  31. 10-Dec-2024

    For Hearing

    Sub Judge

  32. 07-Oct-2024

    For Hearing

    Sub Judge

  33. 09-Sep-2024

    For Hearing

    Sub Judge

  34. 22-Aug-2024

    For Hearing

    Sub Judge

  35. 08-Aug-2024

    For Hearing

    Sub Judge

  36. 02-Aug-2024

    Listed To

    Sub Judge

  37. 13-Jun-2024

    Listed To

    Sub Judge

  38. 08-Apr-2024

    For Hearing

    Sub Judge

  39. 02-Apr-2024

    For Hearing

    Sub Judge

  40. 27-Feb-2024

    Letter to

    Sub Judge

  41. 17-Feb-2024

    For Hearing

    Sub Judge

  42. 09-Feb-2024

    For Hearing

    Sub Judge

  43. 08-Jan-2024

    Listed To

    Sub Judge

  44. 17-Nov-2023

    Not in the list

    Sub Judge

  45. 07-Oct-2023

    Not in the list

    Sub Judge

  46. 22-Aug-2023

    Call with IA

    Sub Judge

  47. 20-Jul-2023

    Call with IA

    Sub Judge

  48. 08-Jun-2023

    Call with IA

    Sub Judge

  49. 18-Jan-2023

    Call with IA

    Sub Judge

  50. 13-Dec-2022

    Call with IA

    Sub Judge

  51. 21-Oct-2022

    For Hearing

    Sub Judge

  52. 19-Jul-2022

    Adjourned

    Sub Judge

  53. 27-May-2022

    Adjourned

    Sub Judge

  54. 20-May-2022

    For Hearing

    Sub Judge

  55. 26-Mar-2022

    Both not ready

    Sub Judge

  56. 21-Mar-2022

    Both not ready

    Sub Judge

  57. 09-Mar-2022

    Both not ready

    Sub Judge

  58. 19-Feb-2022

    Case Re-posted to

    Sub Judge

  59. 15-Dec-2021

    Both not ready

    Sub Judge

  60. 18-Nov-2021

    Both not ready

    Sub Judge

  61. 18-Oct-2021

    Judge on leave / duty

    Sub Judge

  62. 18-Sep-2021

    Case Re-posted to

    Sub Judge

  63. 26-Aug-2021

    Both not ready

    Sub Judge

  64. 21-Jul-2021

    Case Re-posted to

    Sub Judge

  65. 18-Jun-2021

    Adjourned

    Sub Judge

  66. 02-Jun-2021

    Case Re-posted to

    Sub Judge

  67. 19-May-2021

    Case Re-posted to

    Sub Judge

  68. 18-Mar-2021

    Adjourned

    Sub Judge

  69. 09-Feb-2021

    Both not ready

    Sub Judge

  70. 27-Jan-2021

    Both not ready

    Sub Judge

  71. 07-Jan-2021

    Case Re-posted to

    Sub Judge

  72. 02-Dec-2020

    Both not ready

    Sub Judge

  73. 19-Nov-2020

    Judge on leave / duty

    Sub Judge

  74. 31-Oct-2020

    Case Re-posted to

    Sub Judge

  75. 30-Sep-2020

    Case Re-posted to

    Sub Judge

  76. 21-Aug-2020

    Case Re-posted to

    Sub Judge

  77. 24-Jul-2020

    Both not ready

    Sub Judge

  78. 24-Jun-2020

    Both not ready

    Sub Judge

  79. 23-Mar-2020

    Judge on leave / duty

    Sub Judge

  80. 12-Feb-2020

    Both not ready

    Sub Judge

  81. 19-Dec-2019

    Both not ready

    Sub Judge

  82. 13-Nov-2019

    Both not ready

    Sub Judge

  83. 26-Sep-2019

    Both not ready

    Sub Judge

  84. 26-Aug-2019

    For Hearing

    Sub Judge

  85. 27-Jul-2019

    For Hearing

    Sub Judge

  86. 08-Jul-2019

    For Hearing

    Sub Judge

  87. 26-Jun-2019

    For Hearing

    Sub Judge

  88. 10-Jun-2019

    For Hearing

    Sub Judge

  89. 21-May-2019

    For Hearing

    Sub Judge

  90. 03-Apr-2019

    For Hearing

    Sub Judge

  91. 20-Mar-2019

    For Hearing

    Sub Judge

  92. 27-Feb-2019

    For further hearing

    Sub Judge

  93. 21-Feb-2019

    For further hearing

    Sub Judge

  94. 13-Feb-2019

    Adjourned

    Sub Judge

  95. 25-Jan-2019

    For Hearing

    Sub Judge

  96. 17-Jan-2019

    For Hearing

    Sub Judge

  97. 11-Jan-2019

    No further time

    Sub Judge

  98. 21-Dec-2018

    Referred to Mediator

    Sub Judge

  99. 17-Dec-2018

    For Hearing

    Sub Judge

  100. 13-Dec-2018

    For Hearing

    Sub Judge

  101. 07-Dec-2018

    For Hearing

    Sub Judge

  102. 23-Oct-2018

    For Hearing

    Sub Judge

  103. 30-Aug-2018

    For Hearing

    Sub Judge

  104. 07-Jun-2018

    For Hearing

    Sub Judge

  105. 08-Feb-2018

    For Hearing

    Sub Judge

  106. 06-Jan-2018

    For Hearing

    Sub Judge

  107. 13-Dec-2017

    For Hearing

    Sub Judge

  108. 17-Nov-2017

    For Hearing

    Sub Judge

  109. 06-Oct-2017

    For Hearing

    Sub Judge

  110. 26-Aug-2017

    Referred to Mediator

    Sub Judge

  111. 27-Jul-2017

    Referred to Mediator

    Sub Judge

  112. 21-Jun-2017

    call on

    Sub Judge

  113. 23-May-2017

    call on

    Sub Judge

  114. 18-Jan-2017

    Await Lcr

    Sub Judge

  115. 12-Jul-2016

    Await Lcr

    Sub Judge

  116. 17-Mar-2016

    For Hearing

    Sub Judge

  117. 09-Nov-2015

    For Hearing

    Sub Judge

  118. 08-Jun-2015

    For Hearing

    Sub Judge

  119. 06-Jan-2015

    Call with IA

    Sub Judge

  120. 16-Sep-2014

    Call with IA

    Sub Judge

  121. 19-Jul-2014

    Case Re-posted to

    Sub Judge

  122. 26-Mar-2014

    For L C R

    Sub Judge

  123. 05-Dec-2013

    For L C R

    Sub Judge

  124. 10-Sep-2013

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  125. 22-Jun-2011

    Case filed

    Registration No. 44/2011

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The appellate court dismissed the plaintiff's appeal and upheld the trial court's dismissal of an injunction suit. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish his right over the disputed road (Plaint B schedule) or its proper identity, as his evidence was inconsistent with his pleadings and contradicted his own claims in the plaint. Without proving his legal right to the road, the plaintiff was not entitled to the injunctive relief sought against the defendant's alleged encroachment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case