State of Kerala vs Suresh Advocate - Adv.Nicholas Joseph and Vineesh T.V — 138/2014

Disposed: Contested--AQUITTED on 30th March 2026.

Case disposed

SC - SESSIONS CASE

CNR: KLKN190001312014

Filing Number

138/2014

Filing Date

04-Mar-2014

Registration No

138/2014

Registration Date

04-Mar-2014

Court

Sub Court, Payyannur

Judge

1-Sub Judge

Decision Date

30-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--AQUITTED

Last updated 26-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

269

Police Station

Pazhayangadi

Year

1995

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Kerala

    Adv. Additional Public Prosecutor

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Suresh Advocate - Adv.Nicholas Joseph and Vineesh T.V

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Case Summary: Sessions Case 138/2014 The Assistant Sessions Judge acquitted Suresh of all charges under IPC Sections 143, 147, 148, 332, 353, and 307 r/w 149, finding no cogent evidence linking him to a violent October 1995 protest at Pariyaram Medical College. Although 18 prosecution witnesses confirmed a riot occurred where police officers were injured by protesters wielding weapons and stones, none could identify the accused as a participant, with most witnesses explicitly stating they were unable to identify him despite the court's opportunity for examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Sub Judge

  4. 26-Mar-2026

    Order/ Judgement

    Sub Judge

  5. 25-Mar-2026

    Defence Evidence

    Sub Judge

  6. 24-Mar-2026

    For Hearing

    Sub Judge

  7. 23-Mar-2026

    For 313

    Sub Judge

  8. 19-Mar-2026

    Issue NBW

    Sub Judge

  9. 17-Mar-2026

    For evidence

    Sub Judge

  10. 11-Mar-2026

    For evidence

    Sub Judge

  11. 10-Mar-2026

    For evidence

    Sub Judge

  12. 09-Mar-2026

    For evidence

    Sub Judge

  13. 07-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Sub Judge

  14. 06-Mar-2026

    call on

    Sub Judge

  15. 05-Mar-2026

    For evidence

    Sub Judge

  16. 04-Mar-2026

    For evidence

    Sub Judge

  17. 07-Feb-2026

    For evidence

    Sub Judge

  18. 09-Jan-2026

    call on

    Sub Judge

  19. 10-Dec-2025

    call on

    Sub Judge

  20. 17-Oct-2025

    call on

    Sub Judge

  21. 28-Jul-2025

    call on

    Sub Judge

  22. 18-Dec-2024

    call on

    Sub Judge

  23. 21-Aug-2024

    call on

    Sub Judge

  24. 26-Jun-2024

    call on

    Sub Judge

  25. 12-Mar-2024

    call on

    Sub Judge

  26. 12-Jan-2024

    call on

    Sub Judge

  27. 01-Dec-2023

    call on

    Sub Judge

  28. 04-Nov-2023

    call on

    Sub Judge

  29. 26-Sep-2023

    call on

    Sub Judge

  30. 30-Jun-2023

    call on

    Sub Judge

  31. 03-Apr-2023

    Call With Connected Case

    Sub Judge

  32. 04-Feb-2023

    Judge on leave / duty

    Sub Judge

  33. 20-Dec-2022

    Call With Connected Case

    Sub Judge

  34. 25-Oct-2022

    Call With Connected Case

    Sub Judge

  35. 12-Jul-2022

    For framing charge

    Sub Judge

  36. 04-Jun-2022

    call on

    Sub Judge

  37. 08-Apr-2022

    call on

    Sub Judge

  38. 04-Mar-2022

    82-83 steps

    Sub Judge

  39. 10-Feb-2022

    Repeat NBW

    Sub Judge

  40. 10-Dec-2021

    Repeat NBW

    Sub Judge

  41. 18-Nov-2021

    Issue NBW

    Sub Judge

  42. 27-Oct-2021

    For framing charge

    Sub Judge

  43. 18-Sep-2021

    Case Re-posted to

    Sub Judge

  44. 17-Jul-2021

    Case Re-posted to

    Sub Judge

  45. 04-Jun-2021

    Case Re-posted to

    Sub Judge

  46. 19-May-2021

    Case Re-posted to

    Sub Judge

  47. 02-Mar-2021

    Case Re-posted to

    Sub Judge

  48. 18-Jan-2021

    Case Re-posted to

    Sub Judge

  49. 02-Nov-2020

    Case Re-posted to

    Sub Judge

  50. 07-Sep-2020

    Case Re-posted to

    Sub Judge

  51. 03-Jun-2020

    Case Re-posted to

    Sub Judge

  52. 26-Feb-2020

    For framing charge

    Sub Judge

  53. 13-Dec-2019

    For framing charge

    Sub Judge

  54. 22-Oct-2019

    For framing charge

    Sub Judge

  55. 04-Apr-2019

    For framing charge

    Sub Judge

  56. 11-Feb-2019

    For framing charge

    Sub Judge

  57. 13-Nov-2018

    For framing charge

    Sub Judge

  58. 20-Aug-2018

    For framing charge

    Sub Judge

  59. 11-Jul-2018

    For framing charge

    Sub Judge

  60. 24-May-2018

    For framing charge

    Sub Judge

  61. 23-Mar-2018

    For framing charge

    Sub Judge

  62. 23-Mar-2017

    For framing charge

    Sub Judge

  63. 21-Dec-2016

    For framing charge

    Sub Judge

  64. 16-Nov-2016

    For framing charge

    Sub Judge

  65. 01-Sep-2016

    For framing charge

    Sub Judge

  66. 22-Feb-2016

    For framing charge

    Sub Judge

  67. 04-Nov-2015

    For framing charge

    Sub Judge

  68. 20-May-2015

    For framing charge

    Sub Judge

  69. 06-Dec-2014

    Case Re-posted to

    Sub Judge

  70. 16-Jun-2014

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  71. 04-Mar-2014

    Case filed

    Registration No. 138/2014

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Sessions Case 138/2014 The Assistant Sessions Judge acquitted Suresh of all charges under IPC Sections 143, 147, 148, 332, 353, and 307 r/w 149, finding no cogent evidence linking him to a violent October 1995 protest at Pariyaram Medical College. Although 18 prosecution witnesses confirmed a riot occurred where police officers were injured by protesters wielding weapons and stones, none could identify the accused as a participant, with most witnesses explicitly stating they were unable to identify him despite the court's opportunity for examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case