Abdul Rahman.T.T vs Ganeshan Advocate - LAKSHMANAN T.P, LAKSHMANAN T.P — 7400/2016
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--CONVICTED on 28th April 2026.
ST - SUMMARY TRIAL
CNR: KLKN180044732016
Filing Number
7399/2016
Filing Date
29-01-2016
Registration No
7400/2016
Registration Date
29-01-2016
Court
Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Taliparamba
Judge
2-Judicial First Class Magistrate
Decision Date
28th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--CONVICTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Abdul Rahman.T.T
Adv. KUNHIKANNAN D K
Respondent(s)
Ganeshan Advocate - LAKSHMANAN T.P, LAKSHMANAN T.P
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Judicial First Class Magistrate
Disposed
Order/Judgement
Examination of the Accused U/S 351 BNSS
ISSUE NBW TO ACCUSED
PRODUCE ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 28-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 25-04-2026 | Order/Judgement |
| 21-04-2026 | Examination of the Accused U/S 351 BNSS |
| 17-04-2026 | ISSUE NBW TO ACCUSED |
| 07-04-2026 | PRODUCE ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Summary The Judicial First Class Magistrate of Taliparamba convicted Ganeshan under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for dishonoring a cheque of ₹8,00,000 issued as payment for a debt, despite stop-payment instructions. The court found that statutory notice requirements were satisfied through registered post deemed service and that the accused's signature admission triggered legal presumptions favoring the complainant. Ganeshan was sentenced to pay a fine of ₹16,00,000 (covering cheque amount, interest at 9% per annum, and legal costs), with six months simple imprisonment as default punishment, and the fine ordered as compensation to the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Court Summary The Judicial First Class Magistrate of Taliparamba convicted Ganeshan under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for dishonoring a cheque of ₹8,00,000 issued as payment for a debt, despite stop-payment instructions. The court found that statutory notice requirements were satisfied through registered post deemed service and that the accused's signature admission triggered legal presumptions favoring the complainant. Ganeshan was sentenced to pay a fine of ₹16,00,000 (covering cheque amount, interest at 9% per annum, and legal costs), with six months simple imprisonment as default punishment, and the fine ordered as compensation to the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts