State of Kerala vs Junaid K — 1013/2024
Case under Ipc \ Section 341,323,506,498(A). Disposed: Uncontested--ACQUITTED on 18th March 2026.
CC - CALENDAR CASE
CNR: KLKN180036552024
Filing Number
3039/2024
Filing Date
27-08-2024
Registration No
1013/2024
Registration Date
29-08-2024
Court
Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Taliparamba
Judge
2-Judicial First Class Magistrate
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
425
Police Station
Sreekandapuram Police Station
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Kerala
Adv. The APP
Respondent(s)
Junaid K
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Judicial First Class Magistrate
Disposed
For further hearing
Order/Judgement
NBW to CWS
Adjourned
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | For further hearing |
| 13-03-2026 | Order/Judgement |
| 09-02-2026 | NBW to CWS |
| 24-12-2025 | Adjourned |
Interim Orders
The Judicial First Class Magistrate acquitted Junaid K of charges under IPC sections 341 (wrongful restraint), 323 (voluntarily causing hurt), 506 (criminal intimidation), and 498(A) (cruelty/dowry demand). The court found that the sole prosecution witness (the complainant/wife) recanted her testimony, stating the matter had been settled and the complaint was filed based on misunderstanding. With the key witness turning hostile and no corroborating evidence, the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, warranting acquittal under BNSS section 271. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Judicial First Class Magistrate acquitted Junaid K of charges under IPC sections 341 (wrongful restraint), 323 (voluntarily causing hurt), 506 (criminal intimidation), and 498(A) (cruelty/dowry demand). The court found that the sole prosecution witness (the complainant/wife) recanted her testimony, stating the matter had been settled and the complaint was filed based on misunderstanding. With the key witness turning hostile and no corroborating evidence, the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, warranting acquittal under BNSS section 271. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts