SHO, Payyavoor vs Premeen Mathew Advocate - DANISH LUKOSE — 358/2021

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,294(b),506(i)r/w34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CALENDAR CASE

CNR: KLKN180006942021

Filing Number

358/2021

Filing Date

23-Jun-2021

Registration No

358/2021

Registration Date

23-Jun-2021

Court

Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Taliparamba

Judge

2-Judicial First Class Magistrate

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 07-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

17

Police Station

Payyavoor Police Station

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,294(b),506(i)r/w34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHO (Station House Officer), Payyavoor

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Premeen Mathew Advocate - DANISH LUKOSE

  2. 2.C D Mathew

  3. 3.Rosamma

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Case Summary: 358/2021 Court Decision: The Judicial First Class Magistrate, Taliparamba acquitted all three accused (Prameen Mathew, C.D. Mathew, and Rosamma) of charges under IPC sections 341, 323, 294(b), and 506(i) r/w 34, finding them not guilty due to material contradictions in prosecution evidence and reasonable doubt regarding the case's veracity. Key Reasoning: The court identified critical inconsistencies between the complainant's testimony and the scene mahazar regarding the occurrence location; conflicting accounts about whether eyewitnesses actually witnessed the incident; the unexplained absence of a crucial eyewitness; and the complainant's failure to report to police despite alleged assault, instead filing a court complaint through counsel the same day—suggesting possible malice given concurrent dismissed Family Court proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  4. 27-Apr-2026

    JudgementView PDF

  5. 27-Apr-2026

    Order/Judgement

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  6. 06-Apr-2026

    For further hearing

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  7. 25-Mar-2026

    For further hearing

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  8. 11-Mar-2026

    For further hearing

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  9. 26-Feb-2026

    For Hearing

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  10. 17-Feb-2026

    Defence Evidence And Hearing

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  11. 30-Jan-2026

    Produce Accused

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  12. 16-Jan-2026

    Examination of the Accused U/S 313 Cr.PC

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  13. 08-Dec-2025

    call on

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  14. 14-Nov-2025

    Produce Witness

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  15. 10-Oct-2025

    To summon witness

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  16. 12-Sep-2025

    For Steps

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  17. 19-Aug-2025

    For Steps

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  18. 16-Jul-2025

    To summon witness

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  19. 23-Jun-2025

    To summon witness

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  20. 22-May-2025

    NBW to Cws

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  21. 04-Apr-2025

    Issue Summon To Cws

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  22. 06-Mar-2025

    Issue Steps To Cws

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  23. 28-Jan-2025

    Issue Summons To Cws

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  24. 01-Jan-2025

    NBW to Cws

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  25. 27-Nov-2024

    Issue Summons To Cws

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  26. 07-Nov-2024

    Issue Summons To Cws

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  27. 08-Oct-2024

    Repeat NBW

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  28. 06-Aug-2024

    Issue NBW

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  29. 13-Jun-2024

    Issue Summons To Cws

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  30. 16-May-2024

    Repeat NBW

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  31. 19-Feb-2024

    Bound Over

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  32. 07-Feb-2024

    Produce Witness

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  33. 15-Jan-2024

    Issue NBW

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  34. 26-Oct-2023

    For Mediation

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  35. 26-Sep-2023

    Produce Accused

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  36. 14-Jul-2023

    Repeat NBW

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  37. 24-Jun-2023

    Issue NBW

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  38. 02-Dec-2022

    For appearance of the accused

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  39. 04-Nov-2022

    Repeat NBW

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  40. 07-Oct-2022

    For evidence.

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  41. 22-Jul-2022

    For evidence.

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  42. 06-Jul-2022

    For evidence.

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  43. 21-Jun-2022

    For appearance of the accused

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  44. 06-Apr-2022

    Issue summonsed to accused

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  45. 24-Jan-2022

    Issue summonsed to accused

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  46. 20-Oct-2021

    Issue summonsed to accused

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  47. 06-Aug-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  48. 23-Jun-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 358/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 358/2021 Court Decision: The Judicial First Class Magistrate, Taliparamba acquitted all three accused (Prameen Mathew, C.D. Mathew, and Rosamma) of charges under IPC sections 341, 323, 294(b), and 506(i) r/w 34, finding them not guilty due to material contradictions in prosecution evidence and reasonable doubt regarding the case's veracity. Key Reasoning: The court identified critical inconsistencies between the complainant's testimony and the scene mahazar regarding the occurrence location; conflicting accounts about whether eyewitnesses actually witnessed the incident; the unexplained absence of a crucial eyewitness; and the complainant's failure to report to police despite alleged assault, instead filing a court complaint through counsel the same day—suggesting possible malice given concurrent dismissed Family Court proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case