State of Kerala vs Sabir Advocate - DENNY GEORGE — 116/2025
Case under Ipc \ Section 379r/w34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 08th April 2026.
CC - CALENDAR CASE
CNR: KLKN180004762025
Filing Number
474/2025
Filing Date
30-01-2025
Registration No
116/2025
Registration Date
30-01-2025
Court
Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Taliparamba
Judge
2-Judicial First Class Magistrate
Decision Date
08th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
169
Police Station
Alakode Police Station
Year
2016
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Kerala
Adv. The APP
Respondent(s)
Sabir Advocate - DENNY GEORGE
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Judicial First Class Magistrate
Disposed
Order/Judgement
For further hearing
FOR HEARING
FOR DEFENSE EVIDENSE AND HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 26-03-2026 | Order/Judgement |
| 12-03-2026 | For further hearing |
| 24-02-2026 | FOR HEARING |
| 06-02-2026 | FOR DEFENSE EVIDENSE AND HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary The Taliparamba First Class Magistrate acquitted accused Sabir of theft charges (IPC §379 r/w 34) on April 8, 2026, finding insufficient evidence. The court determined that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused committed theft of two goats, as the stolen goats were never recovered, witnesses could not reliably identify the vehicle involved due to darkness and timing issues, and the first accused's confession was inadmissible under the Evidence Act. The accused was set at liberty with bail bond cancelled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary The Taliparamba First Class Magistrate acquitted accused Sabir of theft charges (IPC §379 r/w 34) on April 8, 2026, finding insufficient evidence. The court determined that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused committed theft of two goats, as the stolen goats were never recovered, witnesses could not reliably identify the vehicle involved due to darkness and timing issues, and the first accused's confession was inadmissible under the Evidence Act. The accused was set at liberty with bail bond cancelled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts