Kakkottakath Naduvile Purayil Sainaba vs Kakkottakath Puthiyapurayil Abdul Sathar Advocate - BIJOY KJ — 37/2019
Case under Protection of Children from Sexual Offence Section 11(2),11(3). Status: Call with IA. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
RCP - RENT CONTROL PETITION
CNR: KLKN170011532019
Next Hearing
16th June 2026
Filing Number
10601/2019
Filing Date
28-09-2019
Registration No
37/2019
Registration Date
03-10-2019
Court
Munsiff Court, Taliparamba
Judge
1-Munsiff/JFCMII
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Kakkottakath Naduvile Purayil Sainaba
Adv. M.J. Sebastian.
Respondent(s)
Kakkottakath Puthiyapurayil Abdul Sathar Advocate - BIJOY KJ
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Munsiff/JFCMII
Call with IA
No sitting notified
Call with IA
Call with IA
Call with IA
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-05-2026 | Call with IA |
| 04-04-2026 | No sitting notified |
| 26-03-2026 | Call with IA |
| 12-03-2026 | Call with IA |
| 17-02-2026 | Call with IA |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY: The Rent Control Court (Munsiff) at Taliparamba allowed the eviction petition filed by Sainaba against Abdul Sathar on July 30, 2024. The respondent is directed to surrender vacant possession of the rented rooms within one month from the date of the order, failing which execution shall be through court process. The petitioner is also awarded costs, as the respondent failed to appear for evidence and the petitioner's case regarding rent arrears (₹64,800) and bonafide need for the premises was established unopposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY: The Rent Control Court (Munsiff) at Taliparamba allowed the eviction petition filed by Sainaba against Abdul Sathar on July 30, 2024. The respondent is directed to surrender vacant possession of the rented rooms within one month from the date of the order, failing which execution shall be through court process. The petitioner is also awarded costs, as the respondent failed to appear for evidence and the petitioner's case regarding rent arrears (₹64,800) and bonafide need for the premises was established unopposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts