Kunnappallil Joe Abraham vs Malikkantakath Manha Abdul Rahiman — 391/2018

Case under Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section 7Rule1. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED WITH COST on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLKN170009962018

Filing Number

391/2018

Filing Date

26-Oct-2018

Registration No

391/2018

Registration Date

26-Oct-2018

Court

Munsiff Court, Taliparamba

Judge

1-Munsiff/Jfcmii

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DECREED WITH COST

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section 7Rule1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Kunnappallil Joe Abraham

    Adv. V.K. Raveendran, K.K. Viswanathan.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Malikkantakath Manha Abdul Rahiman

  2. 2.Kunnappallil Lucy

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Summary: The Munsiff's court in Taliparamba decreed a permanent prohibitory injunction in favor of plaintiff Kunnappallil Joe Abraham against defendant Malikkantakath Manha Abdul Rahiman, restraining him from obstructing a mud road (B schedule property) running along the plaintiff's property. The court found that the plaintiff had an easement right over the road through a chain of documented transfers, had been in continuous and peaceful possession with his predecessors, and the defendant had no legal right to obstruct it, especially since the defendant himself used the same road. The first defendant's failure to file a written statement or adduce rebuttal evidence, combined with the Advocate Commissioner's report confirming the road's existence and vehicle usage, supported the decree. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Munsiff/Jfcmii

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Order/ Judgement

    Munsiff/Jfcmii

  5. 04-Mar-2026

    Order/ Judgement

    Munsiff/Jfcmii

  6. 27-Feb-2026

    Order/ Judgement

    Munsiff/Jfcmii

  7. 09-Feb-2026

    For Hearing

    Munsiff/Jfcmii

  8. 23-Jan-2026

    For evidence

    Munsiff/Jfcmii

  9. 11-Dec-2025

    Declared Holidays

    Munsiff/Jfcmii

  10. 14-Nov-2025

    call on

    Munsiff/Jfcmii

  11. 30-Oct-2025

    call on

    Munsiff/Jfcmii

  12. 17-Oct-2025

    Pre trial steps

    Munsiff/Jfcmii

  13. 23-Aug-2025

    Issue notice

    Munsiff/Jfcmii

  14. 05-Aug-2025

    Appearance of Partie

    Munsiff/Jfcmii

  15. 21-Jul-2025

    Appearance of Partie

    Munsiff/Jfcmii

  16. 15-Jul-2025

    For Steps

    Munsiff/Jfcmii

  17. 24-May-2025

    Pre trial steps

    Munsiff/Jfcmii

  18. 28-Feb-2025

    Issues

    Munsiff/Jfcmii

  19. 04-Feb-2025

    Issues

    Munsiff/Jfcmii

  20. 19-Dec-2024

    Issues

    Munsiff/Jfcmii

  21. 23-Nov-2024

    Issues

    Munsiff/Jfcmii

  22. 29-Oct-2024

    Referred to Mediator

    Munsiff/Jfcmii

  23. 13-Sep-2024

    call on

    Munsiff/Jfcmii

  24. 17-Jul-2024

    call on

    Munsiff/Jfcmii

  25. 25-Jun-2024

    Referred to Mediator

    Munsiff/Jfcmii

  26. 04-Apr-2024

    Issues

    Munsiff/Jfcmii

  27. 20-Feb-2024

    Issues

    Munsiff/Jfcmii

  28. 13-Oct-2023

    Issues

    Munsiff/Jfcmii

  29. 23-Jun-2023

    Issues

    Munsiff/Jfcmii

  30. 04-Mar-2023

    Issues

    Munsiff/Jfcmii

  31. 02-Nov-2022

    Issues

    Munsiff/Jfcmii

  32. 12-Jul-2022

    Issues

    Munsiff/Jfcmii

  33. 01-Jun-2022

    Issues

    Munsiff/Jfcmii

  34. 20-Jan-2022

    Issues

    Munsiff/Jfcmii

  35. 24-Sep-2021

    Issues

    Munsiff/Jfcmii

  36. 24-Jun-2021

    Issues

    Munsiff/Jfcmii

  37. 26-Feb-2021

    Issues

    Munsiff/Jfcmii

  38. 24-Nov-2020

    Issues

    Munsiff/Jfcmii

  39. 09-Jul-2020

    Issues

    Munsiff/Jfcmii

  40. 19-Jun-2020

    Issues

    Munsiff/Jfcmii

  41. 26-Nov-2019

    Issues

    Munsiff/Jfcmii

  42. 20-Aug-2019

    Judge on leave / duty

    Munsiff/Jfcmii

  43. 20-Feb-2019

    Written Statement

    Munsiff/Jfcmii

  44. 06-Dec-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  45. 26-Oct-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. 391/2018

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Munsiff's court in Taliparamba decreed a permanent prohibitory injunction in favor of plaintiff Kunnappallil Joe Abraham against defendant Malikkantakath Manha Abdul Rahiman, restraining him from obstructing a mud road (B schedule property) running along the plaintiff's property. The court found that the plaintiff had an easement right over the road through a chain of documented transfers, had been in continuous and peaceful possession with his predecessors, and the defendant had no legal right to obstruct it, especially since the defendant himself used the same road. The first defendant's failure to file a written statement or adduce rebuttal evidence, combined with the Advocate Commissioner's report confirming the road's existence and vehicle usage, supported the decree. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case