Shayana K vs Sreekumar T. — 321/2022
Case under Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section 7Rule1. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 30th March 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLKN170008032022
Filing Number
717/2022
Filing Date
02-Jul-2022
Registration No
321/2022
Registration Date
02-Jul-2022
Court
Munsiff Court, Taliparamba
Judge
1-Munsiff/Jfcmii
Decision Date
30-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Last updated 25-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Shayana K
Adv. P.M. Nandakumar.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sreekumar T.
-
2.Lineesh K.C
-
3.Adilakshmi(Minor)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-Mar-2026
JudgementView PDF
Summary The Munsiff Court dismissed the plaintiff's suit seeking a declaration that the second defendant is the biological father of a child born during her subsistence of marriage to the first defendant. The court held that Section 112 of the Indian Evidence Act creates a conclusive presumption of legitimacy for children born during valid marriage, which can only be rebutted by proving non-access between spouses through strong evidence. Since the plaintiff provided no evidence of non-access and failed to discharge her burden of proof through witness testimony or scientific evidence, the statutory presumption favoring the first defendant as the father remained undisturbed, rendering the declaration claim unjustifiable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Mar-2026
Disposed
Munsiff/Jfcmii
-
12-Mar-2026
Order/ Judgement
Munsiff/Jfcmii
-
16-Feb-2026
Judge on leave / duty
Munsiff/Jfcmii
-
17-Jan-2026
For Hearing
Munsiff/Jfcmii
-
03-Jan-2026
For further hearing
Munsiff/Jfcmii
-
19-Dec-2025
For further hearing
Munsiff/Jfcmii
-
04-Dec-2025
For further hearing
Munsiff/Jfcmii
-
18-Nov-2025
For Hearing
Munsiff/Jfcmii
-
09-Oct-2025
For Hearing
Munsiff/Jfcmii
-
30-Sep-2025
Declared Holidays
Munsiff/Jfcmii
-
22-Sep-2025
For Hearing
Munsiff/Jfcmii
-
22-Aug-2025
For Hearing
Munsiff/Jfcmii
-
18-Jul-2025
For Hearing
Munsiff/Jfcmii
-
24-Jun-2025
For Hearing
Munsiff/Jfcmii
-
28-Mar-2025
For Hearing
Munsiff/Jfcmii
-
06-Mar-2025
For Hearing
Munsiff/Jfcmii
-
19-Feb-2025
For further hearing
Munsiff/Jfcmii
-
24-Jan-2025
Order/Judgement
Munsiff/Jfcmii
-
17-Dec-2024
Order/Judgement
Munsiff/Jfcmii
-
06-Dec-2024
Order/Judgement
Munsiff/Jfcmii
-
26-Nov-2024
Order/Judgement
Munsiff/Jfcmii
-
12-Nov-2024
Order/Judgement
Munsiff/Jfcmii
-
27-Aug-2024
call on
Munsiff/Jfcmii
-
09-Aug-2024
call on
Munsiff/Jfcmii
-
29-Jul-2024
Written Statement
Munsiff/Jfcmii
-
04-Jun-2024
Written Statement
Munsiff/Jfcmii
-
06-Apr-2024
Written Statement
Munsiff/Jfcmii
-
07-Feb-2024
call on
Munsiff/Jfcmii
-
30-Nov-2023
call on
Munsiff/Jfcmii
-
21-Aug-2023
Issue notice
Munsiff/Jfcmii
-
02-Aug-2023
Issues
Munsiff/Jfcmii
-
04-Apr-2023
Written Statement
Munsiff/Jfcmii
-
07-Dec-2022
Written Statement
Munsiff/Jfcmii
-
04-Nov-2022
Written Statement
Munsiff/Jfcmii
-
16-Sep-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Jul-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 321/2022
Summary The Munsiff Court dismissed the plaintiff's suit seeking a declaration that the second defendant is the biological father of a child born during her subsistence of marriage to the first defendant. The court held that Section 112 of the Indian Evidence Act creates a conclusive presumption of legitimacy for children born during valid marriage, which can only be rebutted by proving non-access between spouses through strong evidence. Since the plaintiff provided no evidence of non-access and failed to discharge her burden of proof through witness testimony or scientific evidence, the statutory presumption favoring the first defendant as the father remained undisturbed, rendering the declaration claim unjustifiable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts