The SHO vs Faizal M.K. — 765/2024

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section U/s126(2). Status: FOR HEARING. Next hearing: 15th December 2026.

SC - SESSIONS CASE

CNR: KLKN160009952024

FOR HEARING

Next Hearing

15th December 2026

Filing Number

765/2024

Filing Date

03-12-2024

Registration No

765/2024

Registration Date

03-12-2024

Court

Motor Accident Claims Tribunal / District and Sessions Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Taliparamba

Judge

1-Judge MACT/Additional District and Sessions Court

FIR Details

FIR Number

715

Police Station

Payyannur PS

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section U/s126(2)
Crl.MP/1/2026 Classification : Advance Application Section Faizal M.K.The SHO
Crl.MP/2/2026 Classification : Petition Section Faizal M.K.The SHO

Petitioner(s)

The SHO (Station House Officer)

Adv. APP Grade

Respondent(s)

Faizal M.K.

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Judge MACT/Additional District and Sessions Court

10-06-2026

FOR HEARING

16-03-2026

call on

12-03-2026

For hearing in CMP

10-12-2025

Hearing on Charge

16-06-2025

FOR HEARING

Interim Orders

16-03-2026
Order

Case 765/2024 Summary The Additional District and Sessions Court, Taliparamba granted Faizal M.K.'s petition for a no-objection certificate to renew his passport under Section 6(2)(f) of the Passport Act, 1967, despite pending criminal charges (Sections 126(2) and 110 of BNS). The court balanced the fundamental right to travel abroad against the police's flight-risk concerns, noting the petitioner's regular court attendance and bail compliance with two sureties. The petition was allowed conditionally, permitting passport renewal if otherwise eligible, though separate permissions are required for actual foreign travel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case 765/2024 Summary The Additional District and Sessions Court, Taliparamba granted Faizal M.K.'s petition for a no-objection certificate to renew his passport under Section 6(2)(f) of the Passport Act, 1967, despite pending criminal charges (Sections 126(2) and 110 of BNS). The court balanced the fundamental right to travel abroad against the police's flight-risk concerns, noting the petitioner's regular court attendance and bail compliance with two sureties. The petition was allowed conditionally, permitting passport renewal if otherwise eligible, though separate permissions are required for actual foreign travel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Motor Accident Claims Tribunal / District and Sessions Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Taliparamba All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case