The SHO vs Faizal M.K. — 765/2024
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section U/s126(2). Status: FOR HEARING. Next hearing: 15th December 2026.
SC - SESSIONS CASE
CNR: KLKN160009952024
Next Hearing
15th December 2026
Filing Number
765/2024
Filing Date
03-12-2024
Registration No
765/2024
Registration Date
03-12-2024
Court
Motor Accident Claims Tribunal / District and Sessions Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Taliparamba
Judge
1-Judge MACT/Additional District and Sessions Court
FIR Details
FIR Number
715
Police Station
Payyannur PS
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The SHO (Station House Officer)
Adv. APP Grade
Respondent(s)
Faizal M.K.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judge MACT/Additional District and Sessions Court
FOR HEARING
call on
For hearing in CMP
Hearing on Charge
FOR HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-06-2026 | FOR HEARING |
| 16-03-2026 | call on |
| 12-03-2026 | For hearing in CMP |
| 10-12-2025 | Hearing on Charge |
| 16-06-2025 | FOR HEARING |
Interim Orders
Case 765/2024 Summary The Additional District and Sessions Court, Taliparamba granted Faizal M.K.'s petition for a no-objection certificate to renew his passport under Section 6(2)(f) of the Passport Act, 1967, despite pending criminal charges (Sections 126(2) and 110 of BNS). The court balanced the fundamental right to travel abroad against the police's flight-risk concerns, noting the petitioner's regular court attendance and bail compliance with two sureties. The petition was allowed conditionally, permitting passport renewal if otherwise eligible, though separate permissions are required for actual foreign travel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 765/2024 Summary The Additional District and Sessions Court, Taliparamba granted Faizal M.K.'s petition for a no-objection certificate to renew his passport under Section 6(2)(f) of the Passport Act, 1967, despite pending criminal charges (Sections 126(2) and 110 of BNS). The court balanced the fundamental right to travel abroad against the police's flight-risk concerns, noting the petitioner's regular court attendance and bail compliance with two sureties. The petition was allowed conditionally, permitting passport renewal if otherwise eligible, though separate permissions are required for actual foreign travel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts