Puzhakkal Fathima vs Puzhakkal Sakkir Advocate - RAVEENDRAN — 48/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order41Rule1. Status: For further hearing. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
AS - CIVIL APPEAL
CNR: KLKN160007812025
Next Hearing
17th June 2026
e-Filing Number
23-06-2025
Filing Number
580/2025
Filing Date
23-06-2025
Registration No
48/2025
Registration Date
10-07-2025
Court
Motor Accident Claims Tribunal / District and Sessions Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Taliparamba
Judge
1-Judge MACT/Additional District and Sessions Court
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Puzhakkal Fathima
Adv. Santhosh A K
Respondent(s)
Puzhakkal Sakkir Advocate - RAVEENDRAN
Puzhakkal Khadeeja
Adv. RAVEENDRAN
Puzhakkal Rasheed
Puzhakkal Shafeeque Ahammed Hameed
Adv. RAVEENDRAN
Puzhakkal Amina Hameed
Adv. RAVEENDRAN
Puzhakkal Shaheed
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judge MACT/Additional District and Sessions Court
For further hearing
For further hearing
Call with IA
For hearing on IA
For Steps
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 26-05-2026 | For further hearing |
| 08-04-2026 | For further hearing |
| 01-04-2026 | Call with IA |
| 16-03-2026 | For hearing on IA |
| 19-11-2025 | For Steps |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: AS No. 48 OF 2025 The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Taliparamba, allowed in part an interim application (IA 5/2025) filed under Order 39, Rule 1 CPC. The court restrained respondent Puzhakkal Fathima from alienating or committing waste on the plaint schedule property, finding a prima facie case in favor of petitioner Puzhakkal Sakkir. However, the claim regarding rent receipt from the building on the property was disallowed. The court prioritized substantive justice over technical omissions in party inclusion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: AS No. 48 OF 2025 The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Taliparamba, allowed in part an interim application (IA 5/2025) filed under Order 39, Rule 1 CPC. The court restrained respondent Puzhakkal Fathima from alienating or committing waste on the plaint schedule property, finding a prima facie case in favor of petitioner Puzhakkal Sakkir. However, the claim regarding rent receipt from the building on the property was disallowed. The court prioritized substantive justice over technical omissions in party inclusion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts