Muhammed Ajmal P K vs Sreerag Varior A Advocate - AJAYAKUMAR T V — 50/2025
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 166. Status: Written Statement. Next hearing: 10th December 2026.
OP (MV) - ORIGINAL PETITION (MOTOR VEHICLES)
CNR: KLKN160000762025
e-Filing Number
14-01-2025
Filing Number
58/2025
Filing Date
22-Jan-2025
Registration No
50/2025
Registration Date
22-Jan-2025
Court
Motor Accident Claims Tribunal / District and Sessions Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Taliparamba
Judge
1-Judge MACT/Additional District and Sessions Court
Last updated 25-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Muhammed Ajmal P K
Adv. Santhosh A K
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sreerag Varior A Advocate - AJAYAKUMAR T V
-
2.The Manager, ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co.Ltd.,
-
3.The Manager
Adv. S
Case History
-
10-Dec-2026
Next hearingPending
-
12-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Summary: The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal allowed the Interim Application (IA) filed by ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd. and deleted Respondent 2 (the insurance company) from the case as an unnecessary party, finding it did not have valid insurance coverage at the time of the accident. The petition was heard on March 12, 2026, with no counter-filed by the respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Written Statement
Judge MACT/Additional District and Sessions Court
-
28-Feb-2026
For Counter in IA
Judge MACT/Additional District and Sessions Court
-
08-Jan-2026
Issue notice
Judge MACT/Additional District and Sessions Court
-
10-Sep-2025
No sitting notified
Judge MACT/Additional District and Sessions Court
-
31-Jul-2025
call on
Judge MACT/Additional District and Sessions Court
-
03-Apr-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Jan-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 50/2025
Summary: The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal allowed the Interim Application (IA) filed by ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd. and deleted Respondent 2 (the insurance company) from the case as an unnecessary party, finding it did not have valid insurance coverage at the time of the accident. The petition was heard on March 12, 2026, with no counter-filed by the respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts