SHO CHAKKARAKKAL PS vs SHIJIN P — 16/2022
Case under Ipc 1860 Section 454,380. Disposed: Contested--AQUITTED on 30th April 2026.
CC - CALENDAR CASE
CNR: KLKN150048222024
Filing Number
3796/2024
Filing Date
03-12-2024
Registration No
16/2022
Registration Date
03-12-2024
Court
Judicial First Class Magistrate Court 3 Kannur
Judge
7-Judicial First Class Magistrate No.3, Kannur
Decision Date
30th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--AQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
441
Police Station
CHAKKARAKKALLU
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SHO (Station House Officer) CHAKKARAKKAL PS (Police Station)
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
SHIJIN P
Hearing History
Judge: 7-Judicial First Class Magistrate No.3, Kannur
Disposed
Order/ Judgement
FOR HEARING
Examination of the Accused U/S 313 Cr.PC
Examination of the Accused U/S 313 Cr.PC
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 29-04-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 22-04-2026 | FOR HEARING |
| 04-04-2026 | Examination of the Accused U/S 313 Cr.PC |
| 19-03-2026 | Examination of the Accused U/S 313 Cr.PC |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case CC 16/2022 Shijin P was accused of house trespass (IPC §454) and theft (IPC §380) allegedly committed on 22.06.2022 at an under-construction house in Vellachal, where he allegedly stole cash, an Aadhaar card, and lottery tickets. The court acquitted him as all four prosecution witnesses turned hostile, with the primary complainant (PW1) explicitly stating he never told police the accused committed the theft. The court found the accused and complainant had settled the matter out of court and no credible evidence proved guilt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case CC 16/2022 Shijin P was accused of house trespass (IPC §454) and theft (IPC §380) allegedly committed on 22.06.2022 at an under-construction house in Vellachal, where he allegedly stole cash, an Aadhaar card, and lottery tickets. The court acquitted him as all four prosecution witnesses turned hostile, with the primary complainant (PW1) explicitly stating he never told police the accused committed the theft. The court found the accused and complainant had settled the matter out of court and no credible evidence proved guilt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts