SHO, Mayyil PS vs Abdul Salam K P — 1/2021
Case under Ipc 1860 Section 448,341,323. Disposed: Uncontested--AQUITTED on 31st March 2026.
CC - CALENDAR CASE
CNR: KLKN150039892024
Filing Number
2966/2024
Filing Date
02-09-2024
Registration No
1/2021
Registration Date
02-09-2024
Court
Judicial First Class Magistrate Court 3 Kannur
Judge
7-Judicial First Class Magistrate No.3, Kannur
Decision Date
31st March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--AQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
71
Police Station
MAYYIL
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SHO (Station House Officer), Mayyil PS (Police Station)
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Abdul Salam K P
Hearing History
Judge: 7-Judicial First Class Magistrate No.3, Kannur
Disposed
Order/ Judgement
FOR HEARING
Memo To SHO
for evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 31-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 26-03-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 16-03-2026 | FOR HEARING |
| 21-01-2026 | Memo To SHO |
| 14-11-2025 | for evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: CC 1/2021 Abdul Salam K.P was acquitted of charges under IPC sections 448 (criminal trespass), 341 (wrongful restraint), and 323 (voluntarily causing hurt). The sole prosecution witness (PW1), who was the complainant and alleged victim, turned hostile and testified that he never told police the accused attacked him. The court found that PW1 and the accused had settled the matter out of court, and the prosecution failed to adduce sufficient evidence to establish guilt. The accused was discharged and released from bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CC 1/2021 Abdul Salam K.P was acquitted of charges under IPC sections 448 (criminal trespass), 341 (wrongful restraint), and 323 (voluntarily causing hurt). The sole prosecution witness (PW1), who was the complainant and alleged victim, turned hostile and testified that he never told police the accused attacked him. The court found that PW1 and the accused had settled the matter out of court, and the prosecution failed to adduce sufficient evidence to establish guilt. The accused was discharged and released from bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts