State Police vs Shajith P P — 1348/2022
Case under Ipc \ Section 451,341,324r/w34. Disposed: Uncontested--AQUITTED on 23rd March 2026.
CC - CALENDAR CASE
CNR: KLKN140032152022
Filing Number
3108/2022
Filing Date
23-12-2022
Registration No
1348/2022
Registration Date
23-12-2022
Court
Judicial First Class Magistrate Court 2 Kannur
Judge
6-Judicial First Class Magistrate No.2, Kannur
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--AQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
669
Police Station
Valapattanam Police Station
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Police
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Shajith P P
Shaheer P P
Prabhakaran M
Jishnu K @ Kithu
Adv. SASEENDRAN B P,Sneha PP
Hearing History
Judge: 6-Judicial First Class Magistrate No.2, Kannur
Disposed
Order/Judgement
Await report
Call With MP
Await report
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 18-03-2026 | Order/Judgement |
| 17-03-2026 | Await report |
| 16-03-2026 | Call With MP |
| 13-03-2026 | Await report |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: CC 1348/22 The Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Kannur acquitted all four accused (Shajith P P, Shaheer P P, Prabhakaran M, and Jishnu @ Kithu) of charges under IPC sections 451 (criminal trespass), 341 (wrongful restraint), and 324 (causing hurt with dangerous weapon) read with section 34. The prosecution's sole eyewitness (PW1) turned hostile, failed to identify the assailant, and was cross-examined without yielding incriminating evidence, prompting the prosecution to abandon remaining witnesses. Finding no credible evidence to establish guilt, the court acquitted the accused, released them on bail, and cancelled their bail bonds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CC 1348/22 The Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Kannur acquitted all four accused (Shajith P P, Shaheer P P, Prabhakaran M, and Jishnu @ Kithu) of charges under IPC sections 451 (criminal trespass), 341 (wrongful restraint), and 324 (causing hurt with dangerous weapon) read with section 34. The prosecution's sole eyewitness (PW1) turned hostile, failed to identify the assailant, and was cross-examined without yielding incriminating evidence, prompting the prosecution to abandon remaining witnesses. Finding no credible evidence to establish guilt, the court acquitted the accused, released them on bail, and cancelled their bail bonds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts