State of Kerala (Police) vs VIJAYAN P P — 850/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 118(1). Disposed: Uncontested--AQUITTED on 30th April 2026.
Cr.No(KNR-PS-Valapattanam) - Valapattanam PS
CNR: KLKN140021242025
e-Filing Number
18-08-2025
Filing Number
736/2025
Filing Date
19-08-2025
Registration No
850/2025
Registration Date
31-10-2025
Court
Judicial First Class Magistrate Court 2 Kannur
Judge
6-Judicial First Class Magistrate No.2, Kannur
Decision Date
30th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--AQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
736
Police Station
Valapattanam Police Station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Kerala (Police)
Respondent(s)
VIJAYAN P P
Hearing History
Judge: 6-Judicial First Class Magistrate No.2, Kannur
Disposed
Order/Judgement
remand Extended
remand Extended
remand Extended
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 29-04-2026 | Order/Judgement |
| 27-04-2026 | remand Extended |
| 13-04-2026 | remand Extended |
| 30-03-2026 | remand Extended |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: CC 850/25 The Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Kannur acquitted Vijayan P.P of charges under Section 118(i) BNS (causing hurt with deadly weapon) on April 30, 2026. The sole prosecution witness (PW1), who was the alleged victim, turned hostile and categorically testified that the accused did not attack him, could not identify the assailants, and the prosecution could not establish any incriminating evidence. The court found no credible evidence to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt and acquitted the accused, cancelling his bail bonds and setting him at liberty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CC 850/25 The Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Kannur acquitted Vijayan P.P of charges under Section 118(i) BNS (causing hurt with deadly weapon) on April 30, 2026. The sole prosecution witness (PW1), who was the alleged victim, turned hostile and categorically testified that the accused did not attack him, could not identify the assailants, and the prosecution could not establish any incriminating evidence. The court found no credible evidence to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt and acquitted the accused, cancelling his bail bonds and setting him at liberty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts