State Police vs SHARATH KANIYANKANDY Advocate - GOPALAKRISHNAN K — 709/2023
Case under Ipc \ Section 341,323,326,506(I). Disposed: Uncontested--AQUITTED on 19th March 2026.
CC - CALENDAR CASE
CNR: KLKN140018622023
Filing Number
1828/2023
Filing Date
17-06-2023
Registration No
709/2023
Registration Date
17-06-2023
Court
Judicial First Class Magistrate Court 2 Kannur
Judge
6-Judicial First Class Magistrate No.2, Kannur
Decision Date
19th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--AQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
372
Police Station
Valapattanam Police Station
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Police
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
SHARATH KANIYANKANDY Advocate - GOPALAKRISHNAN K
Hearing History
Judge: 6-Judicial First Class Magistrate No.2, Kannur
Disposed
Order/ Judgement
remand Extended
remand Extended
To summon witness
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 19-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 18-03-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 13-03-2026 | remand Extended |
| 27-02-2026 | remand Extended |
| 13-02-2026 | To summon witness |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 709/2023 Summary The Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Kannur acquitted accused Kaniyankandy Sharath of charges under IPC sections 341, 323, 326, and 506(i) for alleged unlawful restraint, causing hurt and grievous hurt with a shovel, and criminal intimidation. The prosecution's own witnesses (PW1-PW4) turned hostile, with the defacto complainant (PW4) explicitly testifying the accused did not attack him and failing to identify the assailant. Finding no incriminating evidence, the court discharged the accused under Section 248(1) Cr.P.C and cancelled his bail bonds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 709/2023 Summary The Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Kannur acquitted accused Kaniyankandy Sharath of charges under IPC sections 341, 323, 326, and 506(i) for alleged unlawful restraint, causing hurt and grievous hurt with a shovel, and criminal intimidation. The prosecution's own witnesses (PW1-PW4) turned hostile, with the defacto complainant (PW4) explicitly testifying the accused did not attack him and failing to identify the assailant. Finding no incriminating evidence, the court discharged the accused under Section 248(1) Cr.P.C and cancelled his bail bonds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts