State Police vs Manoj Puliyilandi — 497/2019
Case under Ipc \ Section 468,471,420. Disposed: Contested--AQUITTED on 21st March 2026.
CC - CALENDAR CASE
CNR: KLKN140013522019
Filing Number
497/2019
Filing Date
04-05-2019
Registration No
497/2019
Registration Date
04-05-2019
Court
Judicial First Class Magistrate Court 2 Kannur
Judge
6-Judicial First Class Magistrate No.2, Kannur
Decision Date
21st March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--AQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
970
Police Station
Valapattanam Police Station
Year
2018
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Police
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Manoj Puliyilandi
Hearing History
Judge: 6-Judicial First Class Magistrate No.2, Kannur
Disposed
Order/ Judgement
Examination of the Accused U/S 313 Cr.PC
Examination of the Accused U/S 313 Cr.PC
NBW To CWS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 21-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 17-03-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 16-03-2026 | Examination of the Accused U/S 313 Cr.PC |
| 05-03-2026 | Examination of the Accused U/S 313 Cr.PC |
| 25-02-2026 | NBW To CWS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: CC 497/2019 Court Decision: Manoj Puliyilandi was acquitted of charges under IPC Sections 468 (forgery), 471 (using forged documents), and 420 (cheating). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case because the accused was not identified by material witnesses, including the complainant, and the complainant's evidence lacked independent corroboration. The court ruled that evidence from police witnesses alone was insufficient, therefore the accused was entitled to acquittal and released with bail bonds cancelled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CC 497/2019 Court Decision: Manoj Puliyilandi was acquitted of charges under IPC Sections 468 (forgery), 471 (using forged documents), and 420 (cheating). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case because the accused was not identified by material witnesses, including the complainant, and the complainant's evidence lacked independent corroboration. The court ruled that evidence from police witnesses alone was insufficient, therefore the accused was entitled to acquittal and released with bail bonds cancelled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts