M/s Sree Gokulam Chits and Finance Co P Ltd Rep by its Deputy Manager and PA Holder Prajeesh Kumar P vs Shicy Gins — 5692/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138 & 142. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Crl.MP - CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETN.

CNR: KLKN130024722025

Filing Number

7489/2025

Filing Date

23-Aug-2025

Registration No

5692/2025

Registration Date

08-Oct-2025

Court

Judicial First Class Magistrate Court 1 Kannur

Judge

5-Judicial First Class Magistrate No.1, Kannur

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED

Last updated 25-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138 & 142

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/s Sree Gokulam Chits and Finance Co P Ltd Rep by its Deputy Manager and PA Holder Prajeesh Kumar P

    Adv. Saseendran B.P

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Shicy Gins

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    The Judicial First Class Magistrate Court in Kannur dismissed a complaint filed by M/s Sree Gokulam Chits and Finance Co P Ltd against Shicy Gins under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court dismissed the case because the complainant submitted a memo stating that the accused is deceased, making further proceedings untenable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial First Class Magistrate No.1, Kannur

  4. 24-Feb-2026

    Call With Mp

    Judicial First Class Magistrate No.1, Kannur

  5. 29-Jan-2026

    call on

    Judicial First Class Magistrate No.1, Kannur

  6. 13-Oct-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 23-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 5692/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Judicial First Class Magistrate Court in Kannur dismissed a complaint filed by M/s Sree Gokulam Chits and Finance Co P Ltd against Shicy Gins under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court dismissed the case because the complainant submitted a memo stating that the accused is deceased, making further proceedings untenable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case