State Police vs RADHAKRISHNAN PONMUDIYAN Advocate - THOMAS. V.M — 882/2022
Case under Ipc \ Section 341,323,324r/w34. Disposed: Uncontested--AQUITTED on 18th March 2026.
CC - CALENDAR CASE
CNR: KLKN130019412022
Filing Number
1785/2022
Filing Date
19-07-2022
Registration No
882/2022
Registration Date
19-07-2022
Court
Judicial First Class Magistrate Court 1 Kannur
Judge
5-Judicial First Class Magistrate No.1, Kannur
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--AQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
835
Police Station
KANNUR TOWN POLICE STATION
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Police
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
RADHAKRISHNAN PONMUDIYAN Advocate - THOMAS. V.M
SUMESH. P.K
Adv. THOMAS. V.M
Hearing History
Judge: 5-Judicial First Class Magistrate No.1, Kannur
Disposed
Order/ Judgement
Referred to Mediator
To summon witness
for evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 05-03-2026 | Referred to Mediator |
| 30-12-2025 | To summon witness |
| 15-05-2025 | for evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: C.C. 882/2022 Court Decision: The Judicial First Class Magistrate, Kannur acquitted both accused Radhakrishnan Ponmudiyan and Sumesh P.K of charges under IPC sections 341, 323, and 324 (wrongful restraint, voluntarily causing hurt, and causing hurt by dangerous weapon) on March 18, 2026. Key Reasoning: The sole prosecution witness (PW1), the injured informant, turned hostile and testified that he did not know the assailants and that the matter was settled with no grievances against the accused. The prosecution abandoned remaining witnesses and failed to adduce incriminating evidence. The court found insufficient grounds to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. Order: Both accused were set at liberty and bail bonds cancelled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: C.C. 882/2022 Court Decision: The Judicial First Class Magistrate, Kannur acquitted both accused Radhakrishnan Ponmudiyan and Sumesh P.K of charges under IPC sections 341, 323, and 324 (wrongful restraint, voluntarily causing hurt, and causing hurt by dangerous weapon) on March 18, 2026. Key Reasoning: The sole prosecution witness (PW1), the injured informant, turned hostile and testified that he did not know the assailants and that the matter was settled with no grievances against the accused. The prosecution abandoned remaining witnesses and failed to adduce incriminating evidence. The court found insufficient grounds to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. Order: Both accused were set at liberty and bail bonds cancelled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts