State Police vs Visak Chandran Advocate - Mukundan P C — 157/2019
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 406,420. Disposed: Contested--AQUITTED on 16th March 2026.
CC - CALENDAR CASE
CNR: KLKN130003312019
Filing Number
157/2019
Filing Date
13-Feb-2019
Registration No
157/2019
Registration Date
13-Feb-2019
Court
Judicial First Class Magistrate Court 1 Kannur
Judge
5-Judicial First Class Magistrate No.1, Kannur
Decision Date
16-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--AQUITTED
Last updated 10-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
894
Police Station
KANNUR TOWN POLICE STATION
Year
2018
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State Police
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Visak Chandran Advocate - Mukundan P C
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Mar-2026
Judgement
Case Summary: C.C. 157/2019 Court Decision: The Judicial First Class Magistrate acquitted Vishak Chandran of charges under IPC sections 406 (criminal breach of trust) and 420 (cheating), finding insufficient evidence to establish his guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The court found no reliable nexus between the accused and the alleged fraudulent scheme involving a fake training institution. Key Reasoning: The prosecution failed to prove essential elements of both offences—specifically, that money was received by the accused or that victims were induced by deception from inception. Evidence showed payments went to another person (Muneeb), receipts lacked the accused's signature, and the advertisement didn't identify the accused or institution by name. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judicial First Class Magistrate No.1, Kannur
-
10-Mar-2026
Order/ Judgement
Judicial First Class Magistrate No.1, Kannur
-
19-Feb-2026
For Hearing
Judicial First Class Magistrate No.1, Kannur
-
07-Feb-2026
For Hearing
Judicial First Class Magistrate No.1, Kannur
-
29-Jan-2026
Defence Evidence
Judicial First Class Magistrate No.1, Kannur
-
22-Jan-2026
Examination of the Accused U/S 313 Cr.PC
Judicial First Class Magistrate No.1, Kannur
-
13-Jan-2026
Examination of the Accused U/S 313 Cr.PC
Judicial First Class Magistrate No.1, Kannur
-
27-Dec-2025
To summon witness
Judicial First Class Magistrate No.1, Kannur
-
18-Nov-2025
NBW To Cws
Judicial First Class Magistrate No.1, Kannur
-
23-Oct-2025
NBW To Cws
Judicial First Class Magistrate No.1, Kannur
-
04-Oct-2025
NBW To Cws
Judicial First Class Magistrate No.1, Kannur
-
23-Sep-2025
NBW To Cws
Judicial First Class Magistrate No.1, Kannur
-
26-Aug-2025
To summon witness
Judicial First Class Magistrate No.1, Kannur
-
04-Aug-2025
To summon witness
Judicial First Class Magistrate No.1, Kannur
-
10-Jul-2025
NBW and notice to Suerities
Judicial First Class Magistrate No.1, Kannur
-
17-Jun-2025
To summon witness
Judicial First Class Magistrate No.1, Kannur
-
24-May-2025
To summon witness
Judicial First Class Magistrate No.1, Kannur
-
17-May-2025
To summon witness
Judicial First Class Magistrate No.1, Kannur
-
26-Mar-2025
To summon witness
Judicial First Class Magistrate No.1, Kannur
-
27-Feb-2025
To summon witness
Judicial First Class Magistrate No.1, Kannur
-
28-Jan-2025
NBW To Cws
Judicial First Class Magistrate No.1, Kannur
-
10-Jan-2025
Adjourned
Judicial First Class Magistrate No.1, Kannur
-
18-Dec-2024
BW to Cws
Judicial First Class Magistrate No.1, Kannur
-
23-Nov-2024
BW to Cws
Judicial First Class Magistrate No.1, Kannur
-
12-Nov-2024
No sitting notified
Judicial First Class Magistrate No.1, Kannur
-
04-Oct-2024
BW to Cws
Judicial First Class Magistrate No.1, Kannur
-
10-Sep-2024
BW to Cws
Judicial First Class Magistrate No.1, Kannur
-
23-Jul-2024
BW to Cws
Judicial First Class Magistrate No.1, Kannur
-
12-Jun-2024
To summon witness
Judicial First Class Magistrate No.1, Kannur
-
15-Apr-2024
Repeat Summons
Judicial First Class Magistrate No.1, Kannur
-
26-Sep-2023
call on
Judicial First Class Magistrate No.1, Kannur
-
14-Aug-2023
Adjourned
Judicial First Class Magistrate No.1, Kannur
-
02-Jun-2023
To summon witness
Judicial First Class Magistrate No.1, Kannur
-
03-Feb-2023
for evidence
Judicial First Class Magistrate No.1, Kannur
-
02-Nov-2022
for evidence
Judicial First Class Magistrate No.1, Kannur
-
29-Sep-2022
No sitting notified
Judicial First Class Magistrate No.1, Kannur
-
15-Sep-2022
NBW and notice to Suerities
Judicial First Class Magistrate No.1, Kannur
-
19-Aug-2022
NBW and notice to Suerities
Judicial First Class Magistrate No.1, Kannur
-
19-Jul-2022
Repeat NBW
Judicial First Class Magistrate No.1, Kannur
-
24-Jun-2022
Accused absent. Issue NBW
Judicial First Class Magistrate No.1, Kannur
-
25-Apr-2022
Hearing on charge
Judicial First Class Magistrate No.1, Kannur
-
05-Feb-2022
Adjourned
Judicial First Class Magistrate No.1, Kannur
-
18-Nov-2021
Adjourned
Judicial First Class Magistrate No.1, Kannur
-
18-Aug-2021
Adjourned
Judicial First Class Magistrate No.1, Kannur
-
05-Jun-2021
Adjourned
Judicial First Class Magistrate No.1, Kannur
-
02-Feb-2021
Hearing on charge
Judicial First Class Magistrate No.1, Kannur
-
20-Nov-2020
Adjourned
Judicial First Class Magistrate No.1, Kannur
-
12-Aug-2020
call on
Judicial First Class Magistrate No.1, Kannur
-
05-May-2020
call on
Judicial First Class Magistrate No.1, Kannur
-
16-Mar-2020
call on
Judicial First Class Magistrate No.1, Kannur
-
15-Oct-2019
Hearing on charge
Judicial First Class Magistrate No.1, Kannur
-
13-Jun-2019
For framing charge
Judicial First Class Magistrate No.1, Kannur
-
07-May-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Feb-2019
Case filed
Registration No. 157/2019
Case Summary: C.C. 157/2019 Court Decision: The Judicial First Class Magistrate acquitted Vishak Chandran of charges under IPC sections 406 (criminal breach of trust) and 420 (cheating), finding insufficient evidence to establish his guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The court found no reliable nexus between the accused and the alleged fraudulent scheme involving a fake training institution. Key Reasoning: The prosecution failed to prove essential elements of both offences—specifically, that money was received by the accused or that victims were induced by deception from inception. Evidence showed payments went to another person (Muneeb), receipts lacked the accused's signature, and the advertisement didn't identify the accused or institution by name. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts